World University Rankings

Statistical Issues and Possible Remedies

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book World University Rankings by Kaycheng Soh, World Scientific Publishing Company
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Kaycheng Soh ISBN: 9789813200814
Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Company Publication: March 8, 2017
Imprint: WSPC Language: English
Author: Kaycheng Soh
ISBN: 9789813200814
Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Company
Publication: March 8, 2017
Imprint: WSPC
Language: English

World university ranking started one and a half decades ago for the purpose of understanding what makes an excellent institution of higher education. Subsequent to the appearance of the Academic Ranking of World Universities at the Shanghai Jiaotong University, there soon emerged the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. These three ranking systems are considered the classics as they are the fore-runners, although no less than ten new systems have come to the arena.

The various ranking systems adopt a common approach of weight-and-sum to process the indicator data. Each system, somewhat arbitrarily, decides on a set of indicators and assigns different weights to these, presumably reflecting their relative importance. This simple (and simplistic) approach meets well common sense. And, in fact, much of the discussion on world university rankings is conducted at the commonsensical level.

However, analyses conducted in the recent years uncovered several problems of the prevalent approach: spurious precision, mutual compensation, weight discrepancy, indicator redundancy, etc., which render the overall scores and ranking suspect in terms of validity. These are due to systems ignoring the fact that world university rankings are a form of social measurement and therefore need be seen from this perspective.

Moreover, rankings encourage competition and, in the highly competitive world of today, it is natural that institutional attention is focused on the ranking results. By now, the original purpose of world university ranking seems to have been overshadowed, and world university rankings look more like international academic contests, as though they are annual sports meets.

This monograph collects together many articles pertaining to the identified measurement and statistical issues of world university rankings and suggests remedies to make ranking results more trustworthy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

World university ranking started one and a half decades ago for the purpose of understanding what makes an excellent institution of higher education. Subsequent to the appearance of the Academic Ranking of World Universities at the Shanghai Jiaotong University, there soon emerged the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. These three ranking systems are considered the classics as they are the fore-runners, although no less than ten new systems have come to the arena.

The various ranking systems adopt a common approach of weight-and-sum to process the indicator data. Each system, somewhat arbitrarily, decides on a set of indicators and assigns different weights to these, presumably reflecting their relative importance. This simple (and simplistic) approach meets well common sense. And, in fact, much of the discussion on world university rankings is conducted at the commonsensical level.

However, analyses conducted in the recent years uncovered several problems of the prevalent approach: spurious precision, mutual compensation, weight discrepancy, indicator redundancy, etc., which render the overall scores and ranking suspect in terms of validity. These are due to systems ignoring the fact that world university rankings are a form of social measurement and therefore need be seen from this perspective.

Moreover, rankings encourage competition and, in the highly competitive world of today, it is natural that institutional attention is focused on the ranking results. By now, the original purpose of world university ranking seems to have been overshadowed, and world university rankings look more like international academic contests, as though they are annual sports meets.

This monograph collects together many articles pertaining to the identified measurement and statistical issues of world university rankings and suggests remedies to make ranking results more trustworthy.

More books from World Scientific Publishing Company

Cover of the book Solid State Quantum Information — An Advanced Textbook by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Playing with Planets by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Flexible Electronics by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book 2014 Provincial and Inaugural Regional Competitiveness Analysis by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Geometry of Biharmonic Mappings by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Mapping Managerial Implications of Green Strategy by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Introductory Topology by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Heavy Tails and Copulas by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Ginseng and Ginseng Products 101 by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Derivatives Algorithms by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book What is Known and Unexpected at LHC by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Bioevaluation of World Transport Networks by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book New Energy and Sustainable Development by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Global Crisis and Sustainability Technologies by Kaycheng Soh
Cover of the book Oxygen Production and Reduction in Artificial and Natural Systems by Kaycheng Soh
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy