What Is a Human?

What the Answers Mean for Human Rights

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Anthropology, Sociology, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book What Is a Human? by John H. Evans, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: John H. Evans ISBN: 9780190608095
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: July 1, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: John H. Evans
ISBN: 9780190608095
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: July 1, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

What is a human? Are humans those with human DNA, those in possession of traits like rationality, or those made in the image of God? The debate over what makes human beings unique has raged for centuries. Many think that if society accepts the wrong definition of what it is to be human, people will look at their neighbor as more of an animal, object, or machine-making maltreatment more likely. In the longest running claim, for over 150 years critics have claimed that taking a Darwinist definition results in people treating each other more like animals. Despite their seriousness, these claims have never been empirically investigated. In this groundbreaking book John H. Evans shows that the definitions promoted by biologists and philosophers actually are associated with less support for human rights. Members of the public who agree with these definitions are less willing to sacrifice to stop genocides and are more supportive of buying organs from poor people, of experimenting on prisoners against their will, and of torturing people to potentially save lives. It appears that the critics are right. However, Evans finds that few Americans agree with these academic definitions. Looking at how most of the public defines humanity, we see a much more nuanced picture. In a fascinating account, he shows that the dominant definitions are unlikely to lead to human rights abuses. He concludes that the critics are right about the definitions of a human promoted by academic biologists and philosophers, and are therefore justified in their vigilance. However, because at present few Americans agree with these definitions, the academic definitions would have to spread much more extensively before impacting how the general public acts. Evans' book is a major corrective to the more than century-long debate about the impact of definitions of a human.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

What is a human? Are humans those with human DNA, those in possession of traits like rationality, or those made in the image of God? The debate over what makes human beings unique has raged for centuries. Many think that if society accepts the wrong definition of what it is to be human, people will look at their neighbor as more of an animal, object, or machine-making maltreatment more likely. In the longest running claim, for over 150 years critics have claimed that taking a Darwinist definition results in people treating each other more like animals. Despite their seriousness, these claims have never been empirically investigated. In this groundbreaking book John H. Evans shows that the definitions promoted by biologists and philosophers actually are associated with less support for human rights. Members of the public who agree with these definitions are less willing to sacrifice to stop genocides and are more supportive of buying organs from poor people, of experimenting on prisoners against their will, and of torturing people to potentially save lives. It appears that the critics are right. However, Evans finds that few Americans agree with these academic definitions. Looking at how most of the public defines humanity, we see a much more nuanced picture. In a fascinating account, he shows that the dominant definitions are unlikely to lead to human rights abuses. He concludes that the critics are right about the definitions of a human promoted by academic biologists and philosophers, and are therefore justified in their vigilance. However, because at present few Americans agree with these definitions, the academic definitions would have to spread much more extensively before impacting how the general public acts. Evans' book is a major corrective to the more than century-long debate about the impact of definitions of a human.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book The New Hepatitis C by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Molecular Energetics by John H. Evans
Cover of the book From Here and There by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Situated Listening by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Little Women Level 4 Oxford Bookworms Library by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Religious Education and the Challenge of Pluralism by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Children and Disasters by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Qur'an: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Henry Ford by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Imperial Cults and the Apocalypse of John by John H. Evans
Cover of the book American Politics: A Very Short Introduction by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Political Science Research in the Middle East and North Africa by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Democratic Religion by John H. Evans
Cover of the book From the Stage to the Studio by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Coping Effectively With Spinal Cord Injuries by John H. Evans
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy