What Is a Human?

What the Answers Mean for Human Rights

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Anthropology, Sociology, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book What Is a Human? by John H. Evans, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: John H. Evans ISBN: 9780190608095
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: July 1, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: John H. Evans
ISBN: 9780190608095
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: July 1, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

What is a human? Are humans those with human DNA, those in possession of traits like rationality, or those made in the image of God? The debate over what makes human beings unique has raged for centuries. Many think that if society accepts the wrong definition of what it is to be human, people will look at their neighbor as more of an animal, object, or machine-making maltreatment more likely. In the longest running claim, for over 150 years critics have claimed that taking a Darwinist definition results in people treating each other more like animals. Despite their seriousness, these claims have never been empirically investigated. In this groundbreaking book John H. Evans shows that the definitions promoted by biologists and philosophers actually are associated with less support for human rights. Members of the public who agree with these definitions are less willing to sacrifice to stop genocides and are more supportive of buying organs from poor people, of experimenting on prisoners against their will, and of torturing people to potentially save lives. It appears that the critics are right. However, Evans finds that few Americans agree with these academic definitions. Looking at how most of the public defines humanity, we see a much more nuanced picture. In a fascinating account, he shows that the dominant definitions are unlikely to lead to human rights abuses. He concludes that the critics are right about the definitions of a human promoted by academic biologists and philosophers, and are therefore justified in their vigilance. However, because at present few Americans agree with these definitions, the academic definitions would have to spread much more extensively before impacting how the general public acts. Evans' book is a major corrective to the more than century-long debate about the impact of definitions of a human.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

What is a human? Are humans those with human DNA, those in possession of traits like rationality, or those made in the image of God? The debate over what makes human beings unique has raged for centuries. Many think that if society accepts the wrong definition of what it is to be human, people will look at their neighbor as more of an animal, object, or machine-making maltreatment more likely. In the longest running claim, for over 150 years critics have claimed that taking a Darwinist definition results in people treating each other more like animals. Despite their seriousness, these claims have never been empirically investigated. In this groundbreaking book John H. Evans shows that the definitions promoted by biologists and philosophers actually are associated with less support for human rights. Members of the public who agree with these definitions are less willing to sacrifice to stop genocides and are more supportive of buying organs from poor people, of experimenting on prisoners against their will, and of torturing people to potentially save lives. It appears that the critics are right. However, Evans finds that few Americans agree with these academic definitions. Looking at how most of the public defines humanity, we see a much more nuanced picture. In a fascinating account, he shows that the dominant definitions are unlikely to lead to human rights abuses. He concludes that the critics are right about the definitions of a human promoted by academic biologists and philosophers, and are therefore justified in their vigilance. However, because at present few Americans agree with these definitions, the academic definitions would have to spread much more extensively before impacting how the general public acts. Evans' book is a major corrective to the more than century-long debate about the impact of definitions of a human.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book The Future of Imprisonment by John H. Evans
Cover of the book War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission by John H. Evans
Cover of the book A Palace of Pearls by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Family Based Treatment for Young Children With OCD by John H. Evans
Cover of the book The American People in World War II by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Antisocial Media by John H. Evans
Cover of the book The Works of Alain Locke by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Kharijites: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by John H. Evans
Cover of the book The Origin of Concepts by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Endgame for ETA by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Principles of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Rule By Aesthetics by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Advancing Evidence-Based Practice Through Program Evaluation by John H. Evans
Cover of the book From Head to Hand by John H. Evans
Cover of the book Brain Renaissance by John H. Evans
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy