University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 78, Number 4 - Fall 2011

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Jurisprudence
Cover of the book University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 78, Number 4 - Fall 2011 by University of Chicago Law Review, Quid Pro, LLC
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: University of Chicago Law Review ISBN: 9781610279369
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC Publication: April 20, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: University of Chicago Law Review
ISBN: 9781610279369
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication: April 20, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

This final issue of 2011 (University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 78, Number 4 - Fall 2011) features articles and essays from internationally recognized legal scholars and governmental leaders, including Cass Sunstein (on empirically informed regulation), Jonathan Bressler (on jury nullification and Reconstruction), Daniel Schwarcz (on standardized insurance policies), and Bertral Ross II (writing against constitutional mainstreaming in statutory interpretation).

In addition, the issue includes a review essay on the book The Master Switch, as well as student Comments on such subjects as same-sex divorce, religious practices by prisoners, falsely claiming Medal of Honor status, and enhancement in federal sentencing.

The issue is presented in modern eBook formatting and features active Tables of Contents; linked footnotes and URLs; and legible graphs and tables.

The University of Chicago Law Review first appeared in 1933.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This final issue of 2011 (University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 78, Number 4 - Fall 2011) features articles and essays from internationally recognized legal scholars and governmental leaders, including Cass Sunstein (on empirically informed regulation), Jonathan Bressler (on jury nullification and Reconstruction), Daniel Schwarcz (on standardized insurance policies), and Bertral Ross II (writing against constitutional mainstreaming in statutory interpretation).

In addition, the issue includes a review essay on the book The Master Switch, as well as student Comments on such subjects as same-sex divorce, religious practices by prisoners, falsely claiming Medal of Honor status, and enhancement in federal sentencing.

The issue is presented in modern eBook formatting and features active Tables of Contents; linked footnotes and URLs; and legible graphs and tables.

The University of Chicago Law Review first appeared in 1933.

More books from Quid Pro, LLC

Cover of the book Conflict of Interest by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 6 - April 2013 by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Brothers at War: Israel and the Tragedy of the Altalena by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book The Regulation of the Legal Profession in Ireland by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 5 - March 2016 by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book The Law in Political Integration by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book The Enigma of Felix Frankfurter by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Representative Bureaucracy by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 3 - December 2012 by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 7 - May 2013 by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book The Feathery Touch of Death by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 2 - November 2014 by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 7 - May 2015 by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Law in a New Key: Essays on Law and Society by University of Chicago Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 4 - February 2016 by University of Chicago Law Review
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy