United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice

Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Arms Control, Reference & Language, Law, International
Cover of the book United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice by Zachary D. Kaufman, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Zachary D. Kaufman ISBN: 9780190243517
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: March 10, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Zachary D. Kaufman
ISBN: 9780190243517
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: March 10, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the "legalist" paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory-"prudentialism"-which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials' normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the "legalist" paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory-"prudentialism"-which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials' normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Apostasy: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Recognizing Brain Injury by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Rethinking Political Islam by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Incremental Polarization by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Body Dysmorphic Disorder by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Improbable Scholars by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book A Guide to Canadian English Usage by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Popular Music in the Nordic Countries by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book In Praise of Intransigence by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book The People of the Eye by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Bakkhai by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Bullying, School Violence, and Climate in Evolving Contexts by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Benchmarks for Science Literacy by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Pink Ribbon Blues: How Breast Cancer Culture Undermines Women's Health by Zachary D. Kaufman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy