United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice

Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Arms Control, Reference & Language, Law, International
Cover of the book United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice by Zachary D. Kaufman, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Zachary D. Kaufman ISBN: 9780190668419
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: January 2, 2017
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Zachary D. Kaufman
ISBN: 9780190668419
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: January 2, 2017
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the "legalist" paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory-"prudentialism"-which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials' normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the "legalist" paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory-"prudentialism"-which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials' normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Betrayals by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Harlem Renaissance by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book America's God by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Tiny Terror:Why Truman Capote (Almost) Wrote Answered Prayers by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book New Yorkers Level 2 Oxford Bookworms Library by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Ornamentalism by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book United by Faith by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book The Age of Evangelicalism by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Infotopia by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Media and Performance in the Musical by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Composing for the Red Screen by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Problems at the Roots of Law by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Pigskin by Zachary D. Kaufman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy