Turning Point

The Changing Landscape for Women Candidates

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Practical Politics
Cover of the book Turning Point by Barbara Lee Family Foundation, Barbara Lee Family Foundation
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Barbara Lee Family Foundation ISBN: 9780974891361
Publisher: Barbara Lee Family Foundation Publication: June 10, 2011
Imprint: Language: English
Author: Barbara Lee Family Foundation
ISBN: 9780974891361
Publisher: Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Publication: June 10, 2011
Imprint:
Language: English
The 2010 election was the most partisan and polarized in recent American history. Political partisanship trumped all other factors in voters’ decisions, and a desire for change drove many voters to the polls. Voters were conflicted — wanting candidates with government experience and candidates they saw as outsiders able to implement change. Amid this polarization and partisanship, voters’ views on gender and executive leadership shifted. Our 2010 polling and focus groups showed that gender had significantly less impact on voters’ decisions. Women competed in similar ways as their male counterparts, able to convey key traits to voters in equally persuasive ways. In fact, for the first time in our 12 years of research, we found more strategic advantages than disadvantages for women candidates. In other words, gender may now give women candidates an edge. Several candidate qualities that were once a priority for voters but challenging for women to demonstrate, such as toughness, are being replaced by more gender-neutral qualities, such as problem- solving and strength. Voters now rate women and men candidates equally on measures of economic competence. Essential for a winning campaign, credibility on the economy once put women at a disadvantage. That’s no longer automatically true. These shifts eliminate a number of roadblocks women candidates historically have faced in campaigns for executive office. But in becoming less unique to voters, women candidates also have lost some key advantages. In this guide, we take a closer look at voters’ complex views of women gubernatorial candidates in 2010. First, we review key traits shaping voters’ impressions and examine women’s newfound credibility on the economy. We then delve into the advantages and disadvantages of gender. Our voter spotlight looks at the preferences of younger women voters and independent voters. We also look ahead to the unique challenges presented by woman vs. woman races. Finally, we offer advice to campaign teams.
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
The 2010 election was the most partisan and polarized in recent American history. Political partisanship trumped all other factors in voters’ decisions, and a desire for change drove many voters to the polls. Voters were conflicted — wanting candidates with government experience and candidates they saw as outsiders able to implement change. Amid this polarization and partisanship, voters’ views on gender and executive leadership shifted. Our 2010 polling and focus groups showed that gender had significantly less impact on voters’ decisions. Women competed in similar ways as their male counterparts, able to convey key traits to voters in equally persuasive ways. In fact, for the first time in our 12 years of research, we found more strategic advantages than disadvantages for women candidates. In other words, gender may now give women candidates an edge. Several candidate qualities that were once a priority for voters but challenging for women to demonstrate, such as toughness, are being replaced by more gender-neutral qualities, such as problem- solving and strength. Voters now rate women and men candidates equally on measures of economic competence. Essential for a winning campaign, credibility on the economy once put women at a disadvantage. That’s no longer automatically true. These shifts eliminate a number of roadblocks women candidates historically have faced in campaigns for executive office. But in becoming less unique to voters, women candidates also have lost some key advantages. In this guide, we take a closer look at voters’ complex views of women gubernatorial candidates in 2010. First, we review key traits shaping voters’ impressions and examine women’s newfound credibility on the economy. We then delve into the advantages and disadvantages of gender. Our voter spotlight looks at the preferences of younger women voters and independent voters. We also look ahead to the unique challenges presented by woman vs. woman races. Finally, we offer advice to campaign teams.

More books from Practical Politics

Cover of the book Policy Analysis in Canada by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Brindando sobre los escombros by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Nonunion Employee Representation by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Eye on the Money by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book In the Arena by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Imagination in Politics by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Machiavellian Management by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Marine ne perd pas le Nord by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Disunited Kingdom by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book The American Senate by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Die Armutsindustrie by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Collision 2012 by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Reform des Bundestagswahlsystems by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Politiker, Patrioten, Profiteure by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
Cover of the book Guided by the Mountains by Barbara Lee Family Foundation
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy