Tocqueville and Hartz v. Madison

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book Tocqueville and Hartz v. Madison by Peter Neitzsch, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Peter Neitzsch ISBN: 9783638563321
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 31, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Peter Neitzsch
ISBN: 9783638563321
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 31, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 1,3, Dresden Technical University (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Political Ideas and Political Institutions in the United States, 4 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: This essay discusses the question whether - regarding the United States in the late 18th and 19th centuries - we should consider that political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices. For this purpose the arguments of Madison, Tocqueville and Hartz are reconsidered. Since the fall of Rome there was no long lasting democracy in the history of mankind, though there had been several attempts to establish one, all failed in terms of duration. So the founding fathers of the American Constitution in the late 18th century were deeply concerned about the possible failure of the young democracy. So far all empirical evidence supported Platon's teachings of a cycle of returning political regimes that led inevitably from democracy to oligarchy to dictatorship and again to monarchy. The construction of a political system that was both democratic and stable had never worked before. So the main question of this essay, whether political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices, was essential to the people of that time. The Federalists' most important question is: How can one create a stable political order that is still free and democratic? Their answer is: By carefully constructing the political institutions in a way that compensates the imperfection of man. In contrast to this Tocqueville and, tying up to him, Hartz are pointing out the necessity of political values to maintain democratic practices. In my opinion, institutions are more important than political culture in order to create a stable political system, but surely both factors cannot be isolated from each other. Not only do they strongly depend on each other but can probably even be regarded as two sides of the same coin. To prove this thesis I will first introduce the different approaches of Madison, substitutional for The Federalists, who favour a strong state, and of Tocqueville and Hartz, who rather accentuate the importance of political culture and civic virtues. In my opinion all three authors agree on the relevance of both pillars of democracy - polities and culture. Indeed, I believe that Tocqueville recognises the need for strong institutions just as much as Madison. Furthermore I want to introduce 'economic prosperity' as a third stability granting factor to which in my opinion is paid too little attention by the relevant authors.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 1,3, Dresden Technical University (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Political Ideas and Political Institutions in the United States, 4 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: This essay discusses the question whether - regarding the United States in the late 18th and 19th centuries - we should consider that political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices. For this purpose the arguments of Madison, Tocqueville and Hartz are reconsidered. Since the fall of Rome there was no long lasting democracy in the history of mankind, though there had been several attempts to establish one, all failed in terms of duration. So the founding fathers of the American Constitution in the late 18th century were deeply concerned about the possible failure of the young democracy. So far all empirical evidence supported Platon's teachings of a cycle of returning political regimes that led inevitably from democracy to oligarchy to dictatorship and again to monarchy. The construction of a political system that was both democratic and stable had never worked before. So the main question of this essay, whether political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices, was essential to the people of that time. The Federalists' most important question is: How can one create a stable political order that is still free and democratic? Their answer is: By carefully constructing the political institutions in a way that compensates the imperfection of man. In contrast to this Tocqueville and, tying up to him, Hartz are pointing out the necessity of political values to maintain democratic practices. In my opinion, institutions are more important than political culture in order to create a stable political system, but surely both factors cannot be isolated from each other. Not only do they strongly depend on each other but can probably even be regarded as two sides of the same coin. To prove this thesis I will first introduce the different approaches of Madison, substitutional for The Federalists, who favour a strong state, and of Tocqueville and Hartz, who rather accentuate the importance of political culture and civic virtues. In my opinion all three authors agree on the relevance of both pillars of democracy - polities and culture. Indeed, I believe that Tocqueville recognises the need for strong institutions just as much as Madison. Furthermore I want to introduce 'economic prosperity' as a third stability granting factor to which in my opinion is paid too little attention by the relevant authors.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Studies in Semitic Syntax by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Feasibility of Licensing Poppy Cultivation for the Production of Morphine-Based Medicines in Rural Afghanistan by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Speech-accompanying gestures and their impact on speech production and communication by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Role of the Entrepreneurs in Rural Development - New Zealand -Tourism by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Aspect of Ignorance in Golding's Lord of the Flies by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Function of Tense in Lyric Poetry by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Individual and State in William Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Cost-benefit analysis is not scientific, because it requires interpersonal comparisons of well-being by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Lemon. The History and Effects of this Citrus Fruit by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Who Were the Real Imperialists the British or the Zulu? by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Coca and Cocaine in the Andes by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Politeness Phenomenon by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Criminal Law Legislation in the Fight against Terrorism - Comparing Great Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Germany by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Análisis del personaje de Calírroe en 'Quéreas y Calírroe de Caritón' de Caritón de Afrodisias by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Development of a new competence and behaviour model for skills in working with people for project managers by Peter Neitzsch
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy