The Supreme Court under Morrison R. Waite, 1874-1888

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Legal History
Cover of the book The Supreme Court under Morrison R. Waite, 1874-1888 by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson, University of South Carolina Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson ISBN: 9781611172195
Publisher: University of South Carolina Press Publication: October 15, 2012
Imprint: University of South Carolina Press Language: English
Author: Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
ISBN: 9781611172195
Publisher: University of South Carolina Press
Publication: October 15, 2012
Imprint: University of South Carolina Press
Language: English

In The Supreme Court under Morrison R. Waite, 1874-1888, Paul Kens provides a history of the Court during a time that began in the shadow of the Civil War and ended with America on the verge of establishing itself as an industrial world power. Morrison R. Waite (1816-1888) led the Court through a period that experienced great racial violence and sectional strife. At the same time, a commercial revolution produced powerful new corporate businesses and, in turn, dissatisfaction among agrarian and labor interests. The nation was also consolidating the territory west of the Mississippi River, an expansion often marred with bloodshed and turmoil. It was an era that strained America's thinking about the purpose, nature, and structure of government and ultimately about the meaning of the constitution. Challenging the conventional portrayal of the Waite Court as being merely transitional, Kens observes that the majority of these justices viewed themselves as guardians of tradition. Even while facing legal disputes that grew from the drastic changes in post-Civil War America's social, political, and economic order, the Waite Court tended to look backward for its cues. Its rulings on issues of liberty and equality, federalism and the powers of government, and popular sovereignty and the rights of the community were driven by constitutional traditions established prior to the Civil War. This is an important distinction because the conventional portrayal of this Court as transitional leaves the impression that later changes in legal doctrine were virtually inevitable, especially with respect to the subjects of civil rights and economic regulation. By demonstrating that there was nothing inevitable about the way constitutional doctrine has evolved, Kens provides an original and insightful interpretation that enhances our understanding of American constitutional traditions as well as the development of constitutional doctrine in the late nineteenth century.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In The Supreme Court under Morrison R. Waite, 1874-1888, Paul Kens provides a history of the Court during a time that began in the shadow of the Civil War and ended with America on the verge of establishing itself as an industrial world power. Morrison R. Waite (1816-1888) led the Court through a period that experienced great racial violence and sectional strife. At the same time, a commercial revolution produced powerful new corporate businesses and, in turn, dissatisfaction among agrarian and labor interests. The nation was also consolidating the territory west of the Mississippi River, an expansion often marred with bloodshed and turmoil. It was an era that strained America's thinking about the purpose, nature, and structure of government and ultimately about the meaning of the constitution. Challenging the conventional portrayal of the Waite Court as being merely transitional, Kens observes that the majority of these justices viewed themselves as guardians of tradition. Even while facing legal disputes that grew from the drastic changes in post-Civil War America's social, political, and economic order, the Waite Court tended to look backward for its cues. Its rulings on issues of liberty and equality, federalism and the powers of government, and popular sovereignty and the rights of the community were driven by constitutional traditions established prior to the Civil War. This is an important distinction because the conventional portrayal of this Court as transitional leaves the impression that later changes in legal doctrine were virtually inevitable, especially with respect to the subjects of civil rights and economic regulation. By demonstrating that there was nothing inevitable about the way constitutional doctrine has evolved, Kens provides an original and insightful interpretation that enhances our understanding of American constitutional traditions as well as the development of constitutional doctrine in the late nineteenth century.

More books from University of South Carolina Press

Cover of the book Twilight on the South Carolina Rice Fields by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Riverbanks Zoo and Garden by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Ghosts of the Wild West by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Remembering Women Differently by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Flannery O'Connor, Hermit Novelist by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Reflections of South Carolina, Volume 2 by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Understanding Walter Mosley by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book The Cigar Factory by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Phoning Home by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Belvidere by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book A Study of Scarletts by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Understanding Colum McCann by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book More Than a Likeness by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book Introducing Science through Images by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
Cover of the book At Home in the Heart of the Horseshoe by Paul Kens, Herbert A. Johnson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy