The Scandal of Reason

A Critical Theory of Political Judgment

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Political, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book The Scandal of Reason by Albena Azmanova, Columbia University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Albena Azmanova ISBN: 9780231527286
Publisher: Columbia University Press Publication: March 27, 2012
Imprint: Columbia University Press Language: English
Author: Albena Azmanova
ISBN: 9780231527286
Publisher: Columbia University Press
Publication: March 27, 2012
Imprint: Columbia University Press
Language: English

Theories of justice are haunted by a paradox: the more ambitious the theory of justice, the less applicable and useful the model is to political practice; yet the more politically realistic the theory, the weaker its moral ambition, rendering it unsound and equally useless. Brokering a resolution to this "judgment paradox," Albena Azmanova advances a "critical consensus model" of judgment that serves the normative ideals of a just society without the help of ideal theory.

Tracing the evolution of two major traditions in political philosophy—critical theory and philosophical liberalism—and the way they confront the judgment paradox, Azmanova critiques prevailing models of deliberative democracy and their preference for ideal theory over political applicability. Instead, she replaces the reliance on normative models of democracy with an account of the dynamics of reasoned judgment produced in democratic practices of open dialogues. Combining Hannah Arendt's study of judgment with Pierre Bourdieu's social critique of power relations, and incorporating elements of political epistemology from Kant, Wittgenstein, H. L. A. Hart, Max Weber, and American philosophical pragmatism, Azmanova centers her inquiry on the way participants in moral conflicts attribute meaning to their grievances of injustice. She then demonstrates the emancipatory potential of the model of critical deliberative judgment she forges and its capacity to guide policy making.

This model's critical force yields from its capacity to disclose the common structural sources of injustice behind conflicting claims to justice. Moving beyond the conflict between universalist and pluralist positions, Azmanova grounds the question of "what is justice?" in the empirical reality of "who suffers?" in order to discern attainable possibilities for a less unjust world.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Theories of justice are haunted by a paradox: the more ambitious the theory of justice, the less applicable and useful the model is to political practice; yet the more politically realistic the theory, the weaker its moral ambition, rendering it unsound and equally useless. Brokering a resolution to this "judgment paradox," Albena Azmanova advances a "critical consensus model" of judgment that serves the normative ideals of a just society without the help of ideal theory.

Tracing the evolution of two major traditions in political philosophy—critical theory and philosophical liberalism—and the way they confront the judgment paradox, Azmanova critiques prevailing models of deliberative democracy and their preference for ideal theory over political applicability. Instead, she replaces the reliance on normative models of democracy with an account of the dynamics of reasoned judgment produced in democratic practices of open dialogues. Combining Hannah Arendt's study of judgment with Pierre Bourdieu's social critique of power relations, and incorporating elements of political epistemology from Kant, Wittgenstein, H. L. A. Hart, Max Weber, and American philosophical pragmatism, Azmanova centers her inquiry on the way participants in moral conflicts attribute meaning to their grievances of injustice. She then demonstrates the emancipatory potential of the model of critical deliberative judgment she forges and its capacity to guide policy making.

This model's critical force yields from its capacity to disclose the common structural sources of injustice behind conflicting claims to justice. Moving beyond the conflict between universalist and pluralist positions, Azmanova grounds the question of "what is justice?" in the empirical reality of "who suffers?" in order to discern attainable possibilities for a less unjust world.

More books from Columbia University Press

Cover of the book Posthumous Life by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Beyond the Secular West by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Foucault/Derrida Fifty Years Later by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book What Does Europe Want? by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Families of Virtue by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book The Awakened Ones by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Troubled Fields by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book The Columbia Guide to American Environmental History by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book The Severed Head by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Garden Variety by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Governance Without a State? by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Troubling Transparency by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book The Homoerotics of Orientalism by Albena Azmanova
Cover of the book Fairbairn’s Object Relations Theory in the Clinical Setting by Albena Azmanova
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy