The Rationality Quotient

Toward a Test of Rational Thinking

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Science & Nature, Science
Cover of the book The Rationality Quotient by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak, The MIT Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak ISBN: 9780262336826
Publisher: The MIT Press Publication: September 23, 2016
Imprint: The MIT Press Language: English
Author: Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
ISBN: 9780262336826
Publisher: The MIT Press
Publication: September 23, 2016
Imprint: The MIT Press
Language: English

How to assess critical aspects of cognitive functioning that are not measured by IQ tests: rational thinking skills.

Why are we surprised when smart people act foolishly? Smart people do foolish things all the time. Misjudgments and bad decisions by highly educated bankers and money managers, for example, brought us the financial crisis of 2008. Smart people do foolish things because intelligence is not the same as the capacity for rational thinking. The Rationality Quotient explains that these two traits, often (and incorrectly) thought of as one, refer to different cognitive functions. The standard IQ test, the authors argue, doesn't measure any of the broad components of rationality—adaptive responding, good judgment, and good decision making.

The authors show that rational thinking, like intelligence, is a measurable cognitive competence. Drawing on theoretical work and empirical research from the last two decades, they present the first prototype for an assessment of rational thinking analogous to the IQ test: the CART (Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking).

The authors describe the theoretical underpinnings of the CART, distinguishing the algorithmic mind from the reflective mind. They discuss the logic of the tasks used to measure cognitive biases, and they develop a unique typology of thinking errors. The Rationality Quotient explains the components of rational thought assessed by the CART, including probabilistic and scientific reasoning; the avoidance of “miserly” information processing; and the knowledge structures needed for rational thinking. Finally, the authors discuss studies of the CART and the social and practical implications of such a test. An appendix offers sample items from the test.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How to assess critical aspects of cognitive functioning that are not measured by IQ tests: rational thinking skills.

Why are we surprised when smart people act foolishly? Smart people do foolish things all the time. Misjudgments and bad decisions by highly educated bankers and money managers, for example, brought us the financial crisis of 2008. Smart people do foolish things because intelligence is not the same as the capacity for rational thinking. The Rationality Quotient explains that these two traits, often (and incorrectly) thought of as one, refer to different cognitive functions. The standard IQ test, the authors argue, doesn't measure any of the broad components of rationality—adaptive responding, good judgment, and good decision making.

The authors show that rational thinking, like intelligence, is a measurable cognitive competence. Drawing on theoretical work and empirical research from the last two decades, they present the first prototype for an assessment of rational thinking analogous to the IQ test: the CART (Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking).

The authors describe the theoretical underpinnings of the CART, distinguishing the algorithmic mind from the reflective mind. They discuss the logic of the tasks used to measure cognitive biases, and they develop a unique typology of thinking errors. The Rationality Quotient explains the components of rational thought assessed by the CART, including probabilistic and scientific reasoning; the avoidance of “miserly” information processing; and the knowledge structures needed for rational thinking. Finally, the authors discuss studies of the CART and the social and practical implications of such a test. An appendix offers sample items from the test.

More books from The MIT Press

Cover of the book A Voice and Nothing More by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book The Techno-Human Condition by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book GPS by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book Preterm Babies, Fetal Patients, and Childbearing Choices by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book The Future Is Not What It Used to Be by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book Logic Primer by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book 10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10 by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book Small, Gritty, and Green by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book Screen Ecologies by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book In the Swarm by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book Connected Gaming by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book Vision by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book The New Librarianship Field Guide by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book The Book by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
Cover of the book The Green Paradox by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, Maggie E. Toplak
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy