The Maligned Militia

The West Country Militia of the Monmouth Rebellion, 1685

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 17th Century, Military
Cover of the book The Maligned Militia by Christopher L. Scott, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christopher L. Scott ISBN: 9781317024606
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: March 9, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Christopher L. Scott
ISBN: 9781317024606
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: March 9, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Despite its failure to unseat King James II, the Monmouth Rebellion had a profound influence upon English politics. In particular, it reignited the debate about whether the country should rely on a professional army under direct royal control or local country militias made up of part-time soldiers. King James favoured the former, and used criticism of the militia’s performance during the rebellion to support his argument. Contemporary commentators and historians alike all certainly seemed to agree that the king’s victory was won in spite of - not because of - the militia. But is this a fair judgement? Drawing upon a wealth of information gathered from personal accounts, private papers, letters, financial records, diaries and memoirs, this book revisits the events of 1685 to assess the militia’s performance in helping to defeat the so-called ’pitchfork rebellion’. Through an extensive investigation into the militia itself, its social composition, role, training, armament and leadership the study sets a benchmark for what could have been realistically expected of these part-time soldiers, and then sets this against the actual tasks that were asked of it in 1685. The results that emerge from this exercise paint a very different picture of the militia’s role in the rebellion than has hitherto been accepted by historians. Judged by these criteria, a convincing case is made that the militia was in fact an efficient military organisation according to contemporary expectations and demands made of it. Criticisms of it, it is argued, stem more from political expediency than impartial judgment. As well as being of interest to military and social historians, this book demonstrates the dangers to all historians of taking at face value contemporary comments. It shows how subtle and interlocking forces, that may at first glance appear unrelated, can work together to colour opinions of events and organisations.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Despite its failure to unseat King James II, the Monmouth Rebellion had a profound influence upon English politics. In particular, it reignited the debate about whether the country should rely on a professional army under direct royal control or local country militias made up of part-time soldiers. King James favoured the former, and used criticism of the militia’s performance during the rebellion to support his argument. Contemporary commentators and historians alike all certainly seemed to agree that the king’s victory was won in spite of - not because of - the militia. But is this a fair judgement? Drawing upon a wealth of information gathered from personal accounts, private papers, letters, financial records, diaries and memoirs, this book revisits the events of 1685 to assess the militia’s performance in helping to defeat the so-called ’pitchfork rebellion’. Through an extensive investigation into the militia itself, its social composition, role, training, armament and leadership the study sets a benchmark for what could have been realistically expected of these part-time soldiers, and then sets this against the actual tasks that were asked of it in 1685. The results that emerge from this exercise paint a very different picture of the militia’s role in the rebellion than has hitherto been accepted by historians. Judged by these criteria, a convincing case is made that the militia was in fact an efficient military organisation according to contemporary expectations and demands made of it. Criticisms of it, it is argued, stem more from political expediency than impartial judgment. As well as being of interest to military and social historians, this book demonstrates the dangers to all historians of taking at face value contemporary comments. It shows how subtle and interlocking forces, that may at first glance appear unrelated, can work together to colour opinions of events and organisations.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Role-Playing Game Studies by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Roberto Esposito by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book International Public Policy Analysis by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Oceania and the Victorian Imagination by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Diversity and Complexity in Feminist Therapy by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Militant Protestantism and British Identity, 1603–1642 by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Photography and Ontology by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Earth First! and the Anti-Roads Movement by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Laughter At The Foot Of The Cross by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Inclusive Education by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Sociology and Music Education by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Skin in Psychoanalysis by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book A Japanese View of Nature by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Postmodern Criminology by Christopher L. Scott
Cover of the book Walter Benjamin's Concept of the Image by Christopher L. Scott
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy