The Limits of Moral Obligation

Moral Demandingness and Ought Implies Can

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book The Limits of Moral Obligation by , Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9781317581291
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: September 16, 2015
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9781317581291
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: September 16, 2015
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

This volume responds to the growing interest in finding explanations for why moral claims may lose their validity based on what they ask of their addressees. Two main ideas relate to that question: the moral demandingness objection and the principle "ought implies can." Though both of these ideas can be understood to provide an answer to the same question, they have usually been discussed separately in the philosophical literature. The aim of this collection is to provide a focused and comprehensive discussion of these two ideas and the ways in which they relate to one another, and to take a closer look at the consequences for the limits of moral normativity in general. Chapters engage with contemporary discussions surrounding "ought implies can" as well as current debates on moral demandingness, and argue that applying the moral demandingness objection to the entire range of normative ethical theories also calls for an analysis of its (metaethical) presuppositions. The contributions to this volume are at the leading edge of ethical theory, and have implications for moral theorists, philosophers of action, and those working in metaethics, theoretical ethics and applied ethics.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This volume responds to the growing interest in finding explanations for why moral claims may lose their validity based on what they ask of their addressees. Two main ideas relate to that question: the moral demandingness objection and the principle "ought implies can." Though both of these ideas can be understood to provide an answer to the same question, they have usually been discussed separately in the philosophical literature. The aim of this collection is to provide a focused and comprehensive discussion of these two ideas and the ways in which they relate to one another, and to take a closer look at the consequences for the limits of moral normativity in general. Chapters engage with contemporary discussions surrounding "ought implies can" as well as current debates on moral demandingness, and argue that applying the moral demandingness objection to the entire range of normative ethical theories also calls for an analysis of its (metaethical) presuppositions. The contributions to this volume are at the leading edge of ethical theory, and have implications for moral theorists, philosophers of action, and those working in metaethics, theoretical ethics and applied ethics.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Time and the Literary by
Cover of the book Regional Planning for Open Space by
Cover of the book The Europeanization of National Political Parties by
Cover of the book Theological Ethics and Moral Value Phenomena by
Cover of the book Globalisation, State and Labour by
Cover of the book Globalization and Time by
Cover of the book Social Work and Migration by
Cover of the book Fashion and Masculinities in Popular Culture by
Cover of the book Researching the Art of Teaching by
Cover of the book Possession, Demoniacal And Other by
Cover of the book Library Users and Reference Services by
Cover of the book Negotiating with Terrorists by
Cover of the book The Shakespearean International Yearbook by
Cover of the book A Concise Survey of Music Philosophy by
Cover of the book Media Moms & Digital Dads by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy