The German Welfare State and Globalisation: The Social Construction of Path Dependency

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, Foreign Legal Systems
Cover of the book The German Welfare State and Globalisation: The Social Construction of Path Dependency by Matthias Mayer, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Matthias Mayer ISBN: 9783638533898
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: August 13, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Matthias Mayer
ISBN: 9783638533898
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: August 13, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Thesis (M.A.) from the year 2005 in the subject Politics - Political Systems - Germany, grade: sehr gut, London School of Economics, 60 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Economic globalisation seems to have intensified the claims that an extensive national welfare state is no longer sustainable under high exposure to global competition. However, the evidence for significant welfare dismantlement in Germany is missing. In this dissertation, I endeavour to analyse, why globalisation does not seem to have had any significant impact on the German welfare state in terms of serious downwards reform. I contend that the actual impact of economic globalisation on the national welfare state depends a great deal, on how it is interpreted domestically. Hence, I would like to regard the impact of globalisation not only as an exogenous force, but also as a result of what national policy makers, media, electorate, etc. interpret it to entail. In other words, although globalisation really seems to strain existing welfare structures, policy makers still have a considerable scope how to react to these pressures. For my endeavour, I introduce a historical institutionalist framework of path-dependency, which I confront with a social constructivist framework. Prima facie, the path-dependency theorem seems to hold for the German welfare state. However, I claim that a social constructivist angle is able to illuminate how the institutional constraints propagated by the path-dependency thesis can be overcome. Institutional constraints continue to impede welfare reform in German only because the German political elite failed to socially construct the imperative of reform in public discourse, leaving the great majority of the German population unwilling to accept fundamental cutbacks in social benefits. I argue that the Schröder administration attempted to legitimise cutbacks in social services through referring to exogenous pressures of globalisation. In addition, the media discusses the increased need for welfare state reform in the context of globalisation. Although, there seems to be a trend of mounting acceptance of welfare reform among the German population, the general level for support of such measures remains low. I attempt to show that the notion of globalisation on its own appears unable socially construct the public acceptance of serious welfare state reform. Hence, the most likely scenario for the near future of the German welfare state seems the absence of reform until the prolonged economic crisis legitimises significant transformations of the current system.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Thesis (M.A.) from the year 2005 in the subject Politics - Political Systems - Germany, grade: sehr gut, London School of Economics, 60 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Economic globalisation seems to have intensified the claims that an extensive national welfare state is no longer sustainable under high exposure to global competition. However, the evidence for significant welfare dismantlement in Germany is missing. In this dissertation, I endeavour to analyse, why globalisation does not seem to have had any significant impact on the German welfare state in terms of serious downwards reform. I contend that the actual impact of economic globalisation on the national welfare state depends a great deal, on how it is interpreted domestically. Hence, I would like to regard the impact of globalisation not only as an exogenous force, but also as a result of what national policy makers, media, electorate, etc. interpret it to entail. In other words, although globalisation really seems to strain existing welfare structures, policy makers still have a considerable scope how to react to these pressures. For my endeavour, I introduce a historical institutionalist framework of path-dependency, which I confront with a social constructivist framework. Prima facie, the path-dependency theorem seems to hold for the German welfare state. However, I claim that a social constructivist angle is able to illuminate how the institutional constraints propagated by the path-dependency thesis can be overcome. Institutional constraints continue to impede welfare reform in German only because the German political elite failed to socially construct the imperative of reform in public discourse, leaving the great majority of the German population unwilling to accept fundamental cutbacks in social benefits. I argue that the Schröder administration attempted to legitimise cutbacks in social services through referring to exogenous pressures of globalisation. In addition, the media discusses the increased need for welfare state reform in the context of globalisation. Although, there seems to be a trend of mounting acceptance of welfare reform among the German population, the general level for support of such measures remains low. I attempt to show that the notion of globalisation on its own appears unable socially construct the public acceptance of serious welfare state reform. Hence, the most likely scenario for the near future of the German welfare state seems the absence of reform until the prolonged economic crisis legitimises significant transformations of the current system.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book State, cartels and growth: The German Chemical Industry by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book A semantic analysis of the lexical field 'vehicle' by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book The Role of Fate and Society in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book Why the US went to war in 1812 by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book The Massacre of Tlatelolco - The role of the United States in the incidents of 1968 by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book Fatherhood and Paternity in Joyce's 'A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man' by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book The Historian Thucydides - The History of the Peloponnesian War (c. 400 BC) by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book The 'Democratic Peace' proposition and democracies using military force by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book Moralia Coniugalia - Étude sur l'impossible sacralité du mariage à l'époque de la raison by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book Resistance in James Kelman's 'How Late It Was, How Late' by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book Discourse Analysis in D. Lodge's Thinks by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book US foreign policy in 21st century by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book Comparative Forms in British and American English by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book The New Legal Framework for Car Distribution by Matthias Mayer
Cover of the book John Locke - Some thoughts concerning education by Matthias Mayer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy