The Expert versus the Object

Judging Fakes and False Attributions in the Visual Arts

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Property, Art & Architecture, General Art, Criticism
Cover of the book The Expert versus the Object by , Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780199881963
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: April 1, 2004
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780199881963
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: April 1, 2004
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

The authenticity of visual art has always commanded the attention of experts, dealers, collectors, and the art-minded public. Is it "real" or "original" is a way of asking what am I buying? What do I own? What am I looking at? And today more sophisticated questions are being asked: How is authenticity determined and what weight does this determination have in court? This book of essays proposes to answer those questions. Three lines of inquiry are basic to determining authenticity: a connoisseur's evaluation, historical documentation or provenance, and scientific testing. A connoisseur is an expert who evaluates the "rightness" of a work based on much careful scrutiny of many works by an artist and familiarity with that artist's usual manner of working with materials. In determining provenance, a researcher traces the physical object from the artist through a chain of ownership to the present owner--simple enough in concept, though it assumes that the documentation is not faked or inaccurate. The goal is to ensure that the object is the same one that left the artist's hand. Scientific testing, although sometimes useful, is often longer on promise than result. Dating paint or wood samples, for instance, can show that a painting was made in Rembrandt's lifetime, but it cannot prove that it is by Rembrandt's hand. If expert opinion is divided, and large sums of money are involved, a dispute over authenticity may end up in a court of law, where evaluation of expert opinion evidence can be problematic. The essays in this book clarify the nature of the methods outlined above and explain, based on case law, the present status of authentication issues in court. Contributors include experts from Christie's, London; Sotheby's, New York; and the former director of the Frick Collection; as well as leading art historians and art dealers; an art conservator; a forensic graphologist; a philanthropist and collector; and a specialist in French art law. Their collective knowledge on issues of authenticity will be invaluable for anyone interested in the world of visual art.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The authenticity of visual art has always commanded the attention of experts, dealers, collectors, and the art-minded public. Is it "real" or "original" is a way of asking what am I buying? What do I own? What am I looking at? And today more sophisticated questions are being asked: How is authenticity determined and what weight does this determination have in court? This book of essays proposes to answer those questions. Three lines of inquiry are basic to determining authenticity: a connoisseur's evaluation, historical documentation or provenance, and scientific testing. A connoisseur is an expert who evaluates the "rightness" of a work based on much careful scrutiny of many works by an artist and familiarity with that artist's usual manner of working with materials. In determining provenance, a researcher traces the physical object from the artist through a chain of ownership to the present owner--simple enough in concept, though it assumes that the documentation is not faked or inaccurate. The goal is to ensure that the object is the same one that left the artist's hand. Scientific testing, although sometimes useful, is often longer on promise than result. Dating paint or wood samples, for instance, can show that a painting was made in Rembrandt's lifetime, but it cannot prove that it is by Rembrandt's hand. If expert opinion is divided, and large sums of money are involved, a dispute over authenticity may end up in a court of law, where evaluation of expert opinion evidence can be problematic. The essays in this book clarify the nature of the methods outlined above and explain, based on case law, the present status of authentication issues in court. Contributors include experts from Christie's, London; Sotheby's, New York; and the former director of the Frick Collection; as well as leading art historians and art dealers; an art conservator; a forensic graphologist; a philanthropist and collector; and a specialist in French art law. Their collective knowledge on issues of authenticity will be invaluable for anyone interested in the world of visual art.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book 2030 by
Cover of the book The Multilingual Internet by
Cover of the book Where the Conflict Really Lies : Science, Religion, and Naturalism by
Cover of the book The Civil War Dead and American Modernity by
Cover of the book Josephine Lang by
Cover of the book Islam in South Asia: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by
Cover of the book Liberty, Conscience, and Toleration by
Cover of the book An Illustrated Chinese Materia Medica by
Cover of the book Battle Cry Of Freedom : The Civil War Era by
Cover of the book Life Span: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by
Cover of the book Pandora's Picnic Basket: The Potential and Hazards of Genetically Modified Foods by
Cover of the book Spirituality by
Cover of the book The American Occupation of Japan : The Origins of the Cold War in Asia by
Cover of the book Marine Pollution by
Cover of the book Westmoreland's War by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy