Testing Fate

Tay-Sachs Disease and the Right to Be Responsible

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Medical, Reference, History, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Discrimination & Race Relations
Cover of the book Testing Fate by Shelley Z. Reuter, University of Minnesota Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Shelley Z. Reuter ISBN: 9781452951898
Publisher: University of Minnesota Press Publication: August 17, 2016
Imprint: Univ Of Minnesota Press Language: English
Author: Shelley Z. Reuter
ISBN: 9781452951898
Publisher: University of Minnesota Press
Publication: August 17, 2016
Imprint: Univ Of Minnesota Press
Language: English

In today’s world, responsible biocitizenship has become a new way of belonging in society. Individuals are expected to make “responsible” medical choices, including the decision to be screened for genetic disease. Paradoxically, we have even come to see ourselves as having the right to be responsible vis-à-vis the proactive mitigation of genetic risk. At the same time, the concept of genetic disease has become a new and powerful way of defining the boundaries between human groups. Tay-Sachs, an autosomal recessive disorder, is a case in point—with origins in the period of Eastern European Jewish immigration to the United States and United Kingdom that spanned the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it has a long and fraught history as a marker of Jewish racial difference. 

In Testing Fate, Shelley Z. Reuter asks: Can the biocitizen, especially one historically defined as a racialized and pathologized Other, be said to be exercising authentic, free choice in deciding whether to undertake genetic screening? Drawing on a range of historical and contemporary examples—doctors’ medical reports of Tay-Sachs since the first case was documented in 1881, the medical field’s construction of Tay-Sachs as a disease of Jewish immigrants, YouTube videos of children with Tay-Sachs that frame the disease as tragic disability avoidable through a simple genetic test, and medical malpractice suits since the test for the disease became available—Reuter shows that true agency in genetic decision-making can be exercised only from a place of cultural inclusion. Choice in this context is in fact a kind of unfreedom—a moral duty to act that is not really agency at all.  

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In today’s world, responsible biocitizenship has become a new way of belonging in society. Individuals are expected to make “responsible” medical choices, including the decision to be screened for genetic disease. Paradoxically, we have even come to see ourselves as having the right to be responsible vis-à-vis the proactive mitigation of genetic risk. At the same time, the concept of genetic disease has become a new and powerful way of defining the boundaries between human groups. Tay-Sachs, an autosomal recessive disorder, is a case in point—with origins in the period of Eastern European Jewish immigration to the United States and United Kingdom that spanned the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it has a long and fraught history as a marker of Jewish racial difference. 

In Testing Fate, Shelley Z. Reuter asks: Can the biocitizen, especially one historically defined as a racialized and pathologized Other, be said to be exercising authentic, free choice in deciding whether to undertake genetic screening? Drawing on a range of historical and contemporary examples—doctors’ medical reports of Tay-Sachs since the first case was documented in 1881, the medical field’s construction of Tay-Sachs as a disease of Jewish immigrants, YouTube videos of children with Tay-Sachs that frame the disease as tragic disability avoidable through a simple genetic test, and medical malpractice suits since the test for the disease became available—Reuter shows that true agency in genetic decision-making can be exercised only from a place of cultural inclusion. Choice in this context is in fact a kind of unfreedom—a moral duty to act that is not really agency at all.  

More books from University of Minnesota Press

Cover of the book Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Death beyond Disavowal by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book German Autumn by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Ecology without Culture by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Cosmic Apprentice by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Mechademia 7 by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book From Light to Dark by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Simultaneous Worlds by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book The Financial Imaginary by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Riot by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Interpreting Anime by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Connected by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Zombie Theory by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book The Parasite by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Conversations in Maine by Shelley Z. Reuter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy