Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 3 - March 2012

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Gender & the Law, Jurisprudence
Cover of the book Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 3 - March 2012 by Stanford Law Review, Quid Pro, LLC
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Stanford Law Review ISBN: 9781610279468
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC Publication: April 18, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Stanford Law Review
ISBN: 9781610279468
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication: April 18, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. The March 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community.

Contents for the March 2012 issue (number 3 of Volume 64) include:

Prosecuting the Exonerated: Actual Innocence and the Double Jeopardy Clause
By Jordan M. Barry
From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture, and the Conflict of Laws Style
By Karen Knop, Ralf Michaels & Annelise Riles
Fragmentation Nodes: A Study in Financial Innovation, Complexity, and Systemic Risk
By Kathryn Judge
Note: Insurmountable Obstacles: Structural Errors, Procedural Default, and Ineffective Assistance
By Amy Knight Burns
Comment: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes
By Colin McDonell

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. The March 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community.

Contents for the March 2012 issue (number 3 of Volume 64) include:

Prosecuting the Exonerated: Actual Innocence and the Double Jeopardy Clause
By Jordan M. Barry
From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture, and the Conflict of Laws Style
By Karen Knop, Ralf Michaels & Annelise Riles
Fragmentation Nodes: A Study in Financial Innovation, Complexity, and Systemic Risk
By Kathryn Judge
Note: Insurmountable Obstacles: Structural Errors, Procedural Default, and Ineffective Assistance
By Amy Knight Burns
Comment: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes
By Colin McDonell

More books from Quid Pro, LLC

Cover of the book The Right to Privacy by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 51, Number 1 - Winter 2017 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Brave West Wind by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 8 - June 2015 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Fat Chance by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 2 - November 2011 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 6 - April 2014 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: The Classic Essay and New Observations by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Representing the Poor: Legal Advocacy and Welfare Reform During Reagan's Gubernatorial Years by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Murder on the Links by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Roadblocks to Freedom: Slavery and Manumission in the United States South by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book The Negro in Federal Employment: The Quest for Equal Opportunity by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Elements of Judicial Strategy by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Sociological Theory: A Contemporary View: How to Read, Criticize and Do Theory by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Good Courts: The Case for Problem-Solving Justice by Stanford Law Review
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy