Self-Reflection for the Opaque Mind

An Essay in Neo-Sellarsian Philosophy

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mind & Body
Cover of the book Self-Reflection for the Opaque Mind by T. Parent, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: T. Parent ISBN: 9781317210955
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: December 1, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: T. Parent
ISBN: 9781317210955
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: December 1, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

This volume attempts to solve a grave problem about critical self-reflection. The worry is that we critical thinkers are all in "epistemic bad faith" in light of what psychology tells us. After all, the research shows not merely that we are bad at detecting "ego-threatening" thoughts à la Freud. It also indicates that we are ignorant of even our ordinary thoughts—e.g., reasons for our moral judgments of others (Haidt 2001), and even mundane reasons for buying one pair of stockings over another! (Nisbett & Wilson 1977) However, reflection on one’s thoughts requires knowing what those thoughts are in the first place. So if ignorance is the norm, why attempt self-reflection? The activity would just display naivety about psychology. Yet while respecting all the data, this book argues that, remarkably, we are sometimes infallible in our self-discerning judgments. Even so, infallibility does not imply indubitability, and there is no Cartesian ambition to provide a "foundation" for empirical knowledge. The point is rather to explain how self-reflection as a rational activity is possible.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This volume attempts to solve a grave problem about critical self-reflection. The worry is that we critical thinkers are all in "epistemic bad faith" in light of what psychology tells us. After all, the research shows not merely that we are bad at detecting "ego-threatening" thoughts à la Freud. It also indicates that we are ignorant of even our ordinary thoughts—e.g., reasons for our moral judgments of others (Haidt 2001), and even mundane reasons for buying one pair of stockings over another! (Nisbett & Wilson 1977) However, reflection on one’s thoughts requires knowing what those thoughts are in the first place. So if ignorance is the norm, why attempt self-reflection? The activity would just display naivety about psychology. Yet while respecting all the data, this book argues that, remarkably, we are sometimes infallible in our self-discerning judgments. Even so, infallibility does not imply indubitability, and there is no Cartesian ambition to provide a "foundation" for empirical knowledge. The point is rather to explain how self-reflection as a rational activity is possible.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Beyond the Boundaries by T. Parent
Cover of the book A New Japan for the Twenty-First Century by T. Parent
Cover of the book Landscapes and Voices of the Great War by T. Parent
Cover of the book Language, Communication and Education by T. Parent
Cover of the book Environmental Finance and Development by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Islamic Banking by T. Parent
Cover of the book Biosociology by T. Parent
Cover of the book Crusading and Warfare in the Middle Ages by T. Parent
Cover of the book Children's Literature by T. Parent
Cover of the book Monsters, Demons and Psychopaths by T. Parent
Cover of the book Financing the New Federalism by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Multinational Man (RLE International Business) by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Impact of Economic Democracy by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies by T. Parent
Cover of the book Encyclopedia of World Cities by T. Parent
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy