Samuel Beckett: Ohio Impromptu

Impromptu Elements in Samuel Beckett's 'Ohio Impromptu'

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, British
Cover of the book Samuel Beckett: Ohio Impromptu by Oliver Christl, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Oliver Christl ISBN: 9783640495801
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: December 17, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Oliver Christl
ISBN: 9783640495801
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: December 17, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject English - Literature, Works, grade: 2, 0, University of Freiburg, language: English, abstract: Ohio Impromptu, first performed at Ohio State University in 1981, is one of Samuel Beckett's last Plays. In the late period of his creative activity, Beckett's plays are dominated by a language taken out of the context and set free from dramatic action. Ohio Impromptu is in this way no exception, but it stands out among other late plays, like A Peace of Monologue or Rockaby, because of a special characteristic: as the title suggests, Beckett seems to provide us with the dramatic form of an impromptu. Being originally a term in music theory, impromptu means a composition which is improvised and composed without previous preparation (cf. Shaw 1972: 199). The scholar Enoch Brater points out, that '[a]s a theatrical form, an impromptu should appear light, improvised, almost extemporaneous, even if these effects are achieved through premeditation' (Brater 1987: 127). In his essay on Ohio Impromptu, Xerxes Mehta gives a more precise definition: 'An impromptu in the theatre is a quite specific form in which the playwright - usually through the vehicle of a play within a play - attacks his critics, defends his practice, and, traditionally, lets his audience in on a few of the tricks and all of the tribulations of his profession' (Mehta 1996: 97). To present a play within a play and to present the problems of play-acting or play-writing on stage is what Pierre Astier calls the 'meatheatrical dimension' (Astier 1982: 332) of an impromptu. In attempt to investigate the play under such or similar definitions, some scholars have pointed out, that Ohio Impromptu shows diverse elements of an impromptu. In contrast to that, it has also been said, that '[t]here is nothing impromptu about the piece' (Ben-Zvi 1986: 176). Following the given definitions, this paper tries to examine to what extent Ohio Impromptu can be seen as an impromptu, or rather, in which way Samuel Beckett thought about the play as an impromptu. For that purpose, the circumstances and development of the play's creation and the meaning of its title need to be pointed out first. In this connection, the earlier versions of the text are taken into consideration, too. The examination then focuses on the role of the audience and the critics portrayed in the play. Finally, the meaning of the play's specific structure is interpreted. Here the final version of the text stands in foreground.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject English - Literature, Works, grade: 2, 0, University of Freiburg, language: English, abstract: Ohio Impromptu, first performed at Ohio State University in 1981, is one of Samuel Beckett's last Plays. In the late period of his creative activity, Beckett's plays are dominated by a language taken out of the context and set free from dramatic action. Ohio Impromptu is in this way no exception, but it stands out among other late plays, like A Peace of Monologue or Rockaby, because of a special characteristic: as the title suggests, Beckett seems to provide us with the dramatic form of an impromptu. Being originally a term in music theory, impromptu means a composition which is improvised and composed without previous preparation (cf. Shaw 1972: 199). The scholar Enoch Brater points out, that '[a]s a theatrical form, an impromptu should appear light, improvised, almost extemporaneous, even if these effects are achieved through premeditation' (Brater 1987: 127). In his essay on Ohio Impromptu, Xerxes Mehta gives a more precise definition: 'An impromptu in the theatre is a quite specific form in which the playwright - usually through the vehicle of a play within a play - attacks his critics, defends his practice, and, traditionally, lets his audience in on a few of the tricks and all of the tribulations of his profession' (Mehta 1996: 97). To present a play within a play and to present the problems of play-acting or play-writing on stage is what Pierre Astier calls the 'meatheatrical dimension' (Astier 1982: 332) of an impromptu. In attempt to investigate the play under such or similar definitions, some scholars have pointed out, that Ohio Impromptu shows diverse elements of an impromptu. In contrast to that, it has also been said, that '[t]here is nothing impromptu about the piece' (Ben-Zvi 1986: 176). Following the given definitions, this paper tries to examine to what extent Ohio Impromptu can be seen as an impromptu, or rather, in which way Samuel Beckett thought about the play as an impromptu. For that purpose, the circumstances and development of the play's creation and the meaning of its title need to be pointed out first. In this connection, the earlier versions of the text are taken into consideration, too. The examination then focuses on the role of the audience and the critics portrayed in the play. Finally, the meaning of the play's specific structure is interpreted. Here the final version of the text stands in foreground.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The performance of the artist Marina Abramovi? in the MoMA - Museum of Modern Art, N.Y. as a mirror of zeitgeist by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book The relationship between Organizational Commitment, Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Discontent with democracy - How income inequality affects the satisfaction with democratic realities by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Die Darstellung von race und gender in der TV-Serie 'Angel' by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book 'Germany 1990 is not Germany 1939' - The British response to German unification by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book The Relationship between Language and Nation in the Development of Austrian German by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Manhatten Transfer. Dos Passos' depiction of the city of New York and Ellen Thatcher's & Jimmy Herfs' perception of the world by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Shakespeare's Othello: 'Racism in Othello?' by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book D.W. Griffith, Analysis Of Parallel Editing by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book The Double motif in literature using the example of Stevenson's 'The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde' by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Influences of the Education of Jill KerConway and its Conflicts by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book 'Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?' An Interpretation of Sonnet Nr. 18 by William Shakespeare by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Analysis of Dell's Business Strategy by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book Culture shock and stress among international students by Oliver Christl
Cover of the book JAZZ POETRY: Beginnings and its contemporary developments by Oliver Christl
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy