Representing the Poor: Legal Advocacy and Welfare Reform During Reagan's Gubernatorial Years

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Legal Services, Legal History
Cover of the book Representing the Poor: Legal Advocacy and Welfare Reform During Reagan's Gubernatorial Years by Mark N. Aaronson, Quid Pro, LLC
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Mark N. Aaronson ISBN: 9781610278621
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC Publication: April 22, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Mark N. Aaronson
ISBN: 9781610278621
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication: April 22, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

The empirical focus of this book is the contentious political and legal battle over California welfare reform in the early 1970s. It is an extended, multifaceted case study of a kind not much found in the literature on social cause lawyering. The narrative highlights the forceful presence of Ronald Reagan and the pivotal role in representing the welfare poor carried out by Ralph Santiago Abascal, a government-funded legal aid attorney. To counter Reagan’s welfare policy ambitions, Abascal with other legal services lawyers, and in joint cause with recipient-led welfare rights organizations, relied on court litigation not in isolation but as part of an overall strategy that also involved legislative and administrative actions. Within the context of American pluralism and constitutionalism and from an analytical perspective, this study examines the professional and institutional character of group legal representation for the poor as a strategy for political empowerment and social change. While grounded in political and legal history, the study’s conceptual approaches primarily draw on ideas from political science and political theory about representation and from writings in legal ethics and legal education on professional role responsibilities. The principal thematic points are: (1) Social cause lawyering is a systemic necessity for the democratic and equitable functioning of our governing institutions; (2) the client constraints on the role of lawyers for groups or causes have more to do conceptually with understandings about the nature of representation than the applicability of ethical or procedural rules; and (3) the political consequences of such legal advocacy are variable and potentially contradictory.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The empirical focus of this book is the contentious political and legal battle over California welfare reform in the early 1970s. It is an extended, multifaceted case study of a kind not much found in the literature on social cause lawyering. The narrative highlights the forceful presence of Ronald Reagan and the pivotal role in representing the welfare poor carried out by Ralph Santiago Abascal, a government-funded legal aid attorney. To counter Reagan’s welfare policy ambitions, Abascal with other legal services lawyers, and in joint cause with recipient-led welfare rights organizations, relied on court litigation not in isolation but as part of an overall strategy that also involved legislative and administrative actions. Within the context of American pluralism and constitutionalism and from an analytical perspective, this study examines the professional and institutional character of group legal representation for the poor as a strategy for political empowerment and social change. While grounded in political and legal history, the study’s conceptual approaches primarily draw on ideas from political science and political theory about representation and from writings in legal ethics and legal education on professional role responsibilities. The principal thematic points are: (1) Social cause lawyering is a systemic necessity for the democratic and equitable functioning of our governing institutions; (2) the client constraints on the role of lawyers for groups or causes have more to do conceptually with understandings about the nature of representation than the applicability of ethical or procedural rules; and (3) the political consequences of such legal advocacy are variable and potentially contradictory.

More books from Quid Pro, LLC

Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 6 - April 2016 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Reducing Crime, Reducing Incarceration: Essays on Criminal Justice Innovation by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 79, Number 2 - Spring 2012 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Against the Grain: A Historian's Journey by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 4 - Summer 2014 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 5 - March 2016 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 7 - May 2015 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 6 - April 2015 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 8 - June 2014 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers, Doctors and Others by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 50, Number 3 - Spring 2016 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book The Transformation of Criminal Due Process in the Administrative State: The Targeted Urban Crime Narcotics Task Force by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book A Time for Every Purpose by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 6 - April 2017 by Mark N. Aaronson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy