Religion, Science, and Democracy

A Disputational Friendship

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Christianity, Church, Church & State, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book Religion, Science, and Democracy by Lisa L. Stenmark, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lisa L. Stenmark ISBN: 9780739142882
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: March 8, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Lisa L. Stenmark
ISBN: 9780739142882
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: March 8, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Despite the increasing popularity of “religion and science” as an academic discourse, the intersection of science and religion remains a front line in an ongoing “culture war.” The reasons for this lie in an approach to discourse that closely resembles the model of discourse promoted by John Rawls, in which plural discourse —such as between religion and science— is based on a foundation of shared beliefs and established facts. This leads to a “doctrines and discoveries” approach to the relationship of religion and science, which focuses on their respective truth claims in an attempt to find areas of agreement. This framework inherently privileges scientific perspectives, which actually increases conflict between religion and science, and undermines public discourse by inserting absolutes into it. To the extent that the science and religion discourse adopts this approach, it inadvertently increases the conflict between religion and science and limits our ability to address matters of public concern.

This book suggests an alternative model for discourse, a disputational friendship, based on the work of Hannah Arendt. This approach recognizes the role that authorities —and thus religion and science— play in public life, but undermines any attempt to privilege a particular authority, because it promotes the position of the storyteller, who never settles on a single story but always seeks to incorporate many particular stories into her account. A disputational friendship promotes storytelling not by seeking agreement, but by exploring areas of disagreement in order to create the space for more conversations and to generate more stories and additional interpretations. Successful discourse between religion and science is not measured by its ability to determine “truth” or “fact,” but by its ability to continually expand the discourse and promote public life and public judgment.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Despite the increasing popularity of “religion and science” as an academic discourse, the intersection of science and religion remains a front line in an ongoing “culture war.” The reasons for this lie in an approach to discourse that closely resembles the model of discourse promoted by John Rawls, in which plural discourse —such as between religion and science— is based on a foundation of shared beliefs and established facts. This leads to a “doctrines and discoveries” approach to the relationship of religion and science, which focuses on their respective truth claims in an attempt to find areas of agreement. This framework inherently privileges scientific perspectives, which actually increases conflict between religion and science, and undermines public discourse by inserting absolutes into it. To the extent that the science and religion discourse adopts this approach, it inadvertently increases the conflict between religion and science and limits our ability to address matters of public concern.

This book suggests an alternative model for discourse, a disputational friendship, based on the work of Hannah Arendt. This approach recognizes the role that authorities —and thus religion and science— play in public life, but undermines any attempt to privilege a particular authority, because it promotes the position of the storyteller, who never settles on a single story but always seeks to incorporate many particular stories into her account. A disputational friendship promotes storytelling not by seeking agreement, but by exploring areas of disagreement in order to create the space for more conversations and to generate more stories and additional interpretations. Successful discourse between religion and science is not measured by its ability to determine “truth” or “fact,” but by its ability to continually expand the discourse and promote public life and public judgment.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Sinclair Lewis and American Democracy by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Removing the Commons by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Honduras in Dangerous Times by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Political Theory of a Compound Republic by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Rule of Law and Governance in Indigenous Yoruba Society by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Nietzsche's Will to Power Naturalized by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book True Freedom by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Alleged Nazi Collaborators in the United States after World War II by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book China's and Italy's Participation in Peacekeeping Operations by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Wisdom by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Branded Bodies, Rhetoric, and the Neoliberal Nation-State by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Catastrophe and Philosophy by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Dragons with Clay Feet? by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Transnational Punk Communities in Poland by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Existentialist Thought in African American Literature before 1940 by Lisa L. Stenmark
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy