On Adjectival Passives in English

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book On Adjectival Passives in English by Vincey Vattachirayil John, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Vincey Vattachirayil John ISBN: 9783640835751
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: February 18, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Vincey Vattachirayil John
ISBN: 9783640835751
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: February 18, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 3,0, University of Wuppertal, language: English, abstract: There have been various discussions on verbal passives and adjectival passive constructions. Adjectival passives always have stative interpretations, whereas verbal passives can either have a dynamic or a stative interpretation. The question is whether adjectival passive constructions are supposed to be a type of passive constructions, or merely passives in a derivative sense (cf. Huddleston and Pullum, 2002: 1436f). Before researching the differences between the both passive constructions, the main characterization of passive, in general, should be made clear. Åfarli (1992: 8) provides a brief summary of it: [...] every sentence one might reasonably want to call a passive may be minimally characterized as follows: (22) a. Relative to its active counterpart, the passive sentence is marked with special verb morphology. b. The subject of the active sentence never remains subject in the passive counterpart. This statement is also supported by Emonds (2006: 17) who comments that the stress is laid on the role of the subject phrase and its relation to passive morphology. According to this characterization of passives, it could be asserted that adjectival passives are only a part of a verbal passive construction. Except, it can be proven that adjectives and verbal participles can be distinguished. Emonds (2006: 20) suggests a formula to distinguish between verbal and adjectival passives: a.In adjectival passives, the head [A-en] is present in both LF and PF. b.In verbal passives, [A-en] is absent in LF and present only in PF. The suffix -en refers to the simple past in English but it is also the given form for adjectives, which leads to the ambiguity between verbal passives and adjectival passives. The LF, however, helps us to understand whether a passive has an ongoing (dynamic) or a completed (stative) interpretation. In this paper the main focus is on the differences between verbal and adjectival passives. The following study will show how far adjectival predicatives in a passive construction can be considered as passives. Another aim of this paper is to find out whether adjectives are a derivation from verbs, and whether the derivation is the reason that it is impossible to distinguish them.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 3,0, University of Wuppertal, language: English, abstract: There have been various discussions on verbal passives and adjectival passive constructions. Adjectival passives always have stative interpretations, whereas verbal passives can either have a dynamic or a stative interpretation. The question is whether adjectival passive constructions are supposed to be a type of passive constructions, or merely passives in a derivative sense (cf. Huddleston and Pullum, 2002: 1436f). Before researching the differences between the both passive constructions, the main characterization of passive, in general, should be made clear. Åfarli (1992: 8) provides a brief summary of it: [...] every sentence one might reasonably want to call a passive may be minimally characterized as follows: (22) a. Relative to its active counterpart, the passive sentence is marked with special verb morphology. b. The subject of the active sentence never remains subject in the passive counterpart. This statement is also supported by Emonds (2006: 17) who comments that the stress is laid on the role of the subject phrase and its relation to passive morphology. According to this characterization of passives, it could be asserted that adjectival passives are only a part of a verbal passive construction. Except, it can be proven that adjectives and verbal participles can be distinguished. Emonds (2006: 20) suggests a formula to distinguish between verbal and adjectival passives: a.In adjectival passives, the head [A-en] is present in both LF and PF. b.In verbal passives, [A-en] is absent in LF and present only in PF. The suffix -en refers to the simple past in English but it is also the given form for adjectives, which leads to the ambiguity between verbal passives and adjectival passives. The LF, however, helps us to understand whether a passive has an ongoing (dynamic) or a completed (stative) interpretation. In this paper the main focus is on the differences between verbal and adjectival passives. The following study will show how far adjectival predicatives in a passive construction can be considered as passives. Another aim of this paper is to find out whether adjectives are a derivation from verbs, and whether the derivation is the reason that it is impossible to distinguish them.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book 'Freie Bahn dem Marshallplan'? by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Virtual Organisations - The Creation of Value Networks by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Mitt Romney - Using Technology To Spread His Vision by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Aid Policy and the Politics of Aid. Opportunities and Challenges of the Rise of Chinese Foreign Aid in the Pacific Island Countries by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Toward a Russian market economy by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book The relationship between phonology and orthography and the issue of orthographic reform for English by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Why does the German tax payers money cover the loss of the IKB bank? by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Dubai, from the scratch until today - A new vision of tourism? by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Comparison of the Most Important German Commercial Banks by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book The regional, structural and cohesion policy of the European Union: CARDS in Albania by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book The English nasals by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Should UK enter the EMU by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Acceptance and Success Factors for NFC-Mobile-Payment in South Korea. In comparison to Austria and Taiwan by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book New Zealand Accent in contrast to RP by Vincey Vattachirayil John
Cover of the book Gun Policy. A critical analysis of firearm laws in the United States of America by Vincey Vattachirayil John
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy