Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor by Gina Schouten, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Gina Schouten ISBN: 9780192542465
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 2, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Gina Schouten
ISBN: 9780192542465
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 2, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

This book defends progressive political interventions to erode the gendered division of labor as legitimate exercises of coercive political power. The gendered division of labor is widely regarded as the linchpin of gender injustice. The process of gender equalization in domestic and paid labor allocations has stalled, and a growing number of scholars argue that, absent political intervention, further eroding of the gendered division of labor will not be forthcoming anytime soon. Certain political interventions could jumpstart the stalled gender revolution, but beyond their prospects for effectiveness, such interventions stand in need of another kind of justification. In a diverse, liberal state, reasonable citizens will disagree about what makes for a good life and a good society. Because a fundamental commitment of liberalism is to limit political intrusion into the lives of citizens and allow considerable space for those citizens to act on their own conceptions of the good, questions of legitimacy arise. Legitimacy concerns the constraints we must abide by as we seek collective political solutions to our shared social problems, given that we will disagree, reasonably, both about what constitutes a problem and about what costs we should be willing to incur to fix it. The interventions in question would effectively subsidize gender egalitarian lifestyles at a cost to those who prefer to maintain a traditional gendered division of labor. In a pluralistic, liberal society where many citizens reasonably resist the feminist agenda, can we legitimately use scarce public resources to finance coercive interventions to subsidize gender egalitarianism? This book argues that they can, and moreover, that they can even by the lights of political liberalism, a particularly demanding theory of liberal legitimacy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book defends progressive political interventions to erode the gendered division of labor as legitimate exercises of coercive political power. The gendered division of labor is widely regarded as the linchpin of gender injustice. The process of gender equalization in domestic and paid labor allocations has stalled, and a growing number of scholars argue that, absent political intervention, further eroding of the gendered division of labor will not be forthcoming anytime soon. Certain political interventions could jumpstart the stalled gender revolution, but beyond their prospects for effectiveness, such interventions stand in need of another kind of justification. In a diverse, liberal state, reasonable citizens will disagree about what makes for a good life and a good society. Because a fundamental commitment of liberalism is to limit political intrusion into the lives of citizens and allow considerable space for those citizens to act on their own conceptions of the good, questions of legitimacy arise. Legitimacy concerns the constraints we must abide by as we seek collective political solutions to our shared social problems, given that we will disagree, reasonably, both about what constitutes a problem and about what costs we should be willing to incur to fix it. The interventions in question would effectively subsidize gender egalitarian lifestyles at a cost to those who prefer to maintain a traditional gendered division of labor. In a pluralistic, liberal society where many citizens reasonably resist the feminist agenda, can we legitimately use scarce public resources to finance coercive interventions to subsidize gender egalitarianism? This book argues that they can, and moreover, that they can even by the lights of political liberalism, a particularly demanding theory of liberal legitimacy.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Understanding "I" by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket and Related Tales by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The End of Outrage by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Detention in Non-International Armed Conflict by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Criminal Careers in Transition by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Gender Parity and Multicultural Feminism by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Philosophical Devices: Proofs, Probabilities, Possibilities, and Sets by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Chemical Weapons Convention by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Dyslexia and other learning difficulties by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Oxford Companion to Food by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Early Modern English Literature and the Poetics of Cartographic Anxiety by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Red Badge of Courage and Other Stories by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book EU Securities and Financial Markets Regulation by Gina Schouten
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy