Knowing and Seeing

Groundwork for a new empiricism

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Metaphysics
Cover of the book Knowing and Seeing by Michael Ayers, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Michael Ayers ISBN: 9780192570130
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: April 11, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Michael Ayers
ISBN: 9780192570130
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: April 11, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

What is knowledge? What, if anything, can we know? In Knowing and Seeing, Michael Ayers recovers the insight in the traditional distinction between knowledge and belief, according to which 'knowledge' stems from direct and perspicuous cognitive contact with ('seeing') its object, whereas 'belief' relies on 'extraneous' justification. He conducts a careful phenomenological analysis of what it is to perceive one's environment as one's environment, the result of which is not only direct realism, but recognition that in being perceptually aware of anything we are at the same time perceptually aware of how we are aware of it. Perceptual knowing comes with knowing how you know. Some other forms of knowledge are similarly direct and perspicuous, but not all; a distinction is accordingly drawn between primary and secondary knowledge, and Ayers argues that no secondary knowledge is possible without some primary knowledge. Perceptual knowledge supplies the paradigm to which other cases of knowledge are diversely analogous - hence the notorious difficulty of defining knowledge. These conclusions, supported by a detailed examination of the relations between different grammatical constructions in which 'know', 'believe' and 'see' occur, fuel extended critiques of two lines of thought influential in contemporary epistemology: John McDowell's conceptualist and intellectualist account of perceptual knowledge, and Fred Dretske's 'externalist' employment of sceptical argument. Ayers unpicks the arguments for these other views, explains the failure of recent attempts at a comprehensive definition of knowledge, explores the tight relation between knowledge and certainty, and gives an account of how 'defeasibility' should and should not be understood in epistemology.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

What is knowledge? What, if anything, can we know? In Knowing and Seeing, Michael Ayers recovers the insight in the traditional distinction between knowledge and belief, according to which 'knowledge' stems from direct and perspicuous cognitive contact with ('seeing') its object, whereas 'belief' relies on 'extraneous' justification. He conducts a careful phenomenological analysis of what it is to perceive one's environment as one's environment, the result of which is not only direct realism, but recognition that in being perceptually aware of anything we are at the same time perceptually aware of how we are aware of it. Perceptual knowing comes with knowing how you know. Some other forms of knowledge are similarly direct and perspicuous, but not all; a distinction is accordingly drawn between primary and secondary knowledge, and Ayers argues that no secondary knowledge is possible without some primary knowledge. Perceptual knowledge supplies the paradigm to which other cases of knowledge are diversely analogous - hence the notorious difficulty of defining knowledge. These conclusions, supported by a detailed examination of the relations between different grammatical constructions in which 'know', 'believe' and 'see' occur, fuel extended critiques of two lines of thought influential in contemporary epistemology: John McDowell's conceptualist and intellectualist account of perceptual knowledge, and Fred Dretske's 'externalist' employment of sceptical argument. Ayers unpicks the arguments for these other views, explains the failure of recent attempts at a comprehensive definition of knowledge, explores the tight relation between knowledge and certainty, and gives an account of how 'defeasibility' should and should not be understood in epistemology.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The Market Makers by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book The Roman Martyrs by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Tough Choices by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Endowment Asset Management by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Ian Watt by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Origins by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Blackstone's Civil Practice 2014: The Commentary by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Towards Gender Equity in Development by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book His Excellency Eugène Rougon by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Landmark Papers in Rheumatology by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book The Law & Politics of Brexit by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Spinal Interventions in Pain Management by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book Tales of Glass Town, Angria, and Gondal by Michael Ayers
Cover of the book The Phantom of the Opera by Michael Ayers
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy