How is Huntington's myth there is a clash of civilizations used in the post-September 11 discourse on the war against terrorism?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book How is Huntington's myth there is a clash of civilizations used in the post-September 11 discourse on the war against terrorism? by Anne Uhlhaas, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anne Uhlhaas ISBN: 9783638176620
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: March 13, 2003
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Anne Uhlhaas
ISBN: 9783638176620
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: March 13, 2003
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2002 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: ECTS-grade: B = 2, University of Leeds (Institute for Politics and International Studies), course: Popular Culture and International Relations, 13 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The posed question deals with the investigation of the use of Huntington's myth 'there is a clash of civilizations' in the discourses referring to the horrible events on September 11. Hence, several different questions have to be answered, as they are: How does Huntington himself link his myth to the 'war against terrorism'? Which parts of Huntington's myth are used in which way and by whom? Do the users of his myth support or neglect Huntington's original thoughts and do they exert their source deliberately or unconsciously? What do the users of Huntington's myth and Huntington himself fail to mention, which is necessary to let the theories function? And eventually, which theory after all is the one most fitting the facts? Answering the questions, I will argue that the myth is used over the whole discourse, concerning September 11. Interestingly, parts of Huntington's myth are both employed by proponents and opponents of Huntington, sometimes even without recognising it. Instead of speaking of different discourses, one should more precisely say that there is only one huge discourse with different outgrowths and directions. The various arguments are closely linked. Sometimes even opponents use Huntington as their basis in different ways. Therefore, none of the posed arguments - as Huntington's myth itself - can function and be persuasive on its own. It will be argued that, what causes the clash is not just difference - as Huntington suggests - but the vain attempt to create equality. This is the basis for all arguments with regard to September 11. However, if creating equality is the cause of the terrorist attack, it is neither the existence of different cultures, the powerful behaviour of the US nor the violent roots within the Muslim world which can account for the reason of the terrorist attacks. It is in fact the process of globalisation and the consequential disappearance of cultural power which causes the actual problem.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2002 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: ECTS-grade: B = 2, University of Leeds (Institute for Politics and International Studies), course: Popular Culture and International Relations, 13 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The posed question deals with the investigation of the use of Huntington's myth 'there is a clash of civilizations' in the discourses referring to the horrible events on September 11. Hence, several different questions have to be answered, as they are: How does Huntington himself link his myth to the 'war against terrorism'? Which parts of Huntington's myth are used in which way and by whom? Do the users of his myth support or neglect Huntington's original thoughts and do they exert their source deliberately or unconsciously? What do the users of Huntington's myth and Huntington himself fail to mention, which is necessary to let the theories function? And eventually, which theory after all is the one most fitting the facts? Answering the questions, I will argue that the myth is used over the whole discourse, concerning September 11. Interestingly, parts of Huntington's myth are both employed by proponents and opponents of Huntington, sometimes even without recognising it. Instead of speaking of different discourses, one should more precisely say that there is only one huge discourse with different outgrowths and directions. The various arguments are closely linked. Sometimes even opponents use Huntington as their basis in different ways. Therefore, none of the posed arguments - as Huntington's myth itself - can function and be persuasive on its own. It will be argued that, what causes the clash is not just difference - as Huntington suggests - but the vain attempt to create equality. This is the basis for all arguments with regard to September 11. However, if creating equality is the cause of the terrorist attack, it is neither the existence of different cultures, the powerful behaviour of the US nor the violent roots within the Muslim world which can account for the reason of the terrorist attacks. It is in fact the process of globalisation and the consequential disappearance of cultural power which causes the actual problem.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Culture and Oral Health by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Be moved, be bold, be theatre - Starting A Professional Theatre Company in Rural America by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Der synkretistische Allgötterkult Antiochos I. von Kommagene by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book The Role of Denomination in the Northern Ireland Conflict by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book The do-Periphrasis by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Iraq against the United States of America: a proposal of a judgment of the International Court of Justice (events of 2003) by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book The Systemic Strategy Process in Dynamic Markets by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book A narrow boundary and a narrow understanding of morality by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Business Ethics - Is a more social economy possible? by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Coherence and the textual function in 'The curious incident of the dog in the night-time' by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book International Business Environment: About the merits of globalisation, the role of WTO in world trade, emerging and transition economies (China and Eastern Europe) and trade liberalisation by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book German 'Leitkultur' - What is the content of the German 'Leitkultur'? by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book The Gatekeeper-Model of Innovation by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Legal Aspect of E-Commerce: Dealing as a File-Hosting Website in UK by Anne Uhlhaas
Cover of the book Social and sexual hierarchies: Male-female relationships in Arundhati Roy's 'The God of Small Things' by Anne Uhlhaas
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy