Freedom of Speech and the Function of Rhetoric in the United States

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Language Arts, Public Speaking, Rhetoric, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Freedom of Speech and the Function of Rhetoric in the United States by Michael Donnelly, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Michael Donnelly ISBN: 9781498513562
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: November 30, 2016
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Michael Donnelly
ISBN: 9781498513562
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: November 30, 2016
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

This book is about Freedom of Speech and public discourse in the United States. Freedom of Speech is a major component of the cultural context in which we live, think, work, and write, generally revered as the foundation of true democracy. But the issue has a great deal more to do with social norms rooted in a web of cultural assumptions about the function of rhetoric in social organization generally, and in a democratic society specifically. The dominant, liberal notion of free speech in the United States, assumed to be self-evidently true, is, in fact, a particular historical and cultural formation, rooted in Enlightenment philosophies and dependent on a collection of false narratives about the founding of the country, the role of speech and media in its development, and the relationship between capitalism and democracy. Most importantly, this notion of freedom of speech relies on a warped sense of the function of rhetoric in democratic social organization. By privileging individual expression, at the expense of democratic deliberation, the liberal notion of free speech functions largely to suppress rather than promote meaningful public discussion and debate, and works to sustain unequal relations of power. The presumed democratization of the public sphere, via the Internet, raises more questions than it answers—who has access and who doesn’t, who commands attention and why, and what sorts of effects such expression actually has. We need to think a great deal more carefully about the values subsumed and ignored in an uncritical attachment to a particular version of the public sphere. This book seeks to illuminate the ways in which cultural framing diminishes the complexity of free speech and sublimates a range of value-choices. A more fully democratic society requires a more critical view of freedom of speech.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book is about Freedom of Speech and public discourse in the United States. Freedom of Speech is a major component of the cultural context in which we live, think, work, and write, generally revered as the foundation of true democracy. But the issue has a great deal more to do with social norms rooted in a web of cultural assumptions about the function of rhetoric in social organization generally, and in a democratic society specifically. The dominant, liberal notion of free speech in the United States, assumed to be self-evidently true, is, in fact, a particular historical and cultural formation, rooted in Enlightenment philosophies and dependent on a collection of false narratives about the founding of the country, the role of speech and media in its development, and the relationship between capitalism and democracy. Most importantly, this notion of freedom of speech relies on a warped sense of the function of rhetoric in democratic social organization. By privileging individual expression, at the expense of democratic deliberation, the liberal notion of free speech functions largely to suppress rather than promote meaningful public discussion and debate, and works to sustain unequal relations of power. The presumed democratization of the public sphere, via the Internet, raises more questions than it answers—who has access and who doesn’t, who commands attention and why, and what sorts of effects such expression actually has. We need to think a great deal more carefully about the values subsumed and ignored in an uncritical attachment to a particular version of the public sphere. This book seeks to illuminate the ways in which cultural framing diminishes the complexity of free speech and sublimates a range of value-choices. A more fully democratic society requires a more critical view of freedom of speech.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book The Tragedy of Antony and Cleopatra by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book The American Founding and the Social Compact by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Body of Christ Incarnate for You by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Crucible of Freedom by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Between Two Worlds by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Animals and War by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Promoting Abstinence, Being Faithful, and Condom Use with Young Africans by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Hair, Headwear, and Orthodox Jewish Women by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Dramatic Action in Greek Tragedy and Noh by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Unbecoming Female Monsters by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Brokerage and Production in the American and French Entertainment Industries by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Essays on Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Hermeneutics in the Genre of Mukhta?ar by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Rural Women's Sexuality, Reproductive Health, and Illiteracy by Michael Donnelly
Cover of the book Gadflies in the Public Space by Michael Donnelly
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy