Egyptian Oedipus

Athanasius Kircher and the Secrets of Antiquity

Nonfiction, History, Renaissance, European General
Cover of the book Egyptian Oedipus by Daniel Stolzenberg, University of Chicago Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel Stolzenberg ISBN: 9780226924151
Publisher: University of Chicago Press Publication: April 1, 2013
Imprint: University of Chicago Press Language: English
Author: Daniel Stolzenberg
ISBN: 9780226924151
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication: April 1, 2013
Imprint: University of Chicago Press
Language: English

A contemporary of Descartes and Newton, Athanasius Kircher, S. J. (1601/2–80), was one of Europe’s most inventive and versatile scholars in the baroque era. He published more than thirty works in fields as diverse as astronomy, magnetism, cryptology, numerology, geology, and music. But Kircher is most famous—or infamous—for his quixotic attempt to decipher the Egyptian hieroglyphs and reconstruct the ancient traditions they encoded. In 1655, after more than two decades of toil, Kircher published his solution to the hieroglyphs, Oedipus Aegyptiacus, a work that has been called “one of the most learned monstrosities of all times.” Here Daniel Stolzenberg presents a new interpretation of Kircher’s hieroglyphic studies, placing them in the context of seventeenth-century scholarship on paganism and Oriental languages.

           

Situating Kircher in the social world of baroque Rome, with its scholars, artists, patrons, and censors, Stolzenberg shows how Kircher’s study of ancient paganism depended on the circulation of texts, artifacts, and people between Christian and Islamic civilizations. Along with other participants in the rise of Oriental studies, Kircher aimed to revolutionize the study of the past by mastering Near Eastern languages and recovering ancient manuscripts hidden away in the legendary libraries of Cairo and Damascus. The spectacular flaws of his scholarship have fostered an image of Kircher as an eccentric anachronism, a throwback to the Renaissance hermetic tradition. Stolzenberg argues against this view, showing how Kircher embodied essential tensions of a pivotal phase in European intellectual history, when pre-Enlightenment scholars pioneered modern empirical methods of studying the past while still working within traditional frameworks, such as biblical history and beliefs about magic and esoteric wisdom.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A contemporary of Descartes and Newton, Athanasius Kircher, S. J. (1601/2–80), was one of Europe’s most inventive and versatile scholars in the baroque era. He published more than thirty works in fields as diverse as astronomy, magnetism, cryptology, numerology, geology, and music. But Kircher is most famous—or infamous—for his quixotic attempt to decipher the Egyptian hieroglyphs and reconstruct the ancient traditions they encoded. In 1655, after more than two decades of toil, Kircher published his solution to the hieroglyphs, Oedipus Aegyptiacus, a work that has been called “one of the most learned monstrosities of all times.” Here Daniel Stolzenberg presents a new interpretation of Kircher’s hieroglyphic studies, placing them in the context of seventeenth-century scholarship on paganism and Oriental languages.

           

Situating Kircher in the social world of baroque Rome, with its scholars, artists, patrons, and censors, Stolzenberg shows how Kircher’s study of ancient paganism depended on the circulation of texts, artifacts, and people between Christian and Islamic civilizations. Along with other participants in the rise of Oriental studies, Kircher aimed to revolutionize the study of the past by mastering Near Eastern languages and recovering ancient manuscripts hidden away in the legendary libraries of Cairo and Damascus. The spectacular flaws of his scholarship have fostered an image of Kircher as an eccentric anachronism, a throwback to the Renaissance hermetic tradition. Stolzenberg argues against this view, showing how Kircher embodied essential tensions of a pivotal phase in European intellectual history, when pre-Enlightenment scholars pioneered modern empirical methods of studying the past while still working within traditional frameworks, such as biblical history and beliefs about magic and esoteric wisdom.

More books from University of Chicago Press

Cover of the book The History by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Reclaiming Accountability by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Affective Circuits by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Saving Babies? by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Love Game by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Planters, Merchants, and Slaves by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book The Renaissance Philosophy of Man by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book The Search for Justice by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939 by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book The Trials of Mrs. K. by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Archives of the Insensible by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Women in the Club by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Science, Faith and Society by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book Against Prediction by Daniel Stolzenberg
Cover of the book The Invention of Religion in Japan by Daniel Stolzenberg
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy