Debating Immigration in the Age of Terrorism, Polarization, and Trump

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Cultural Studies, Emigration & Immigration, Political Science
Cover of the book Debating Immigration in the Age of Terrorism, Polarization, and Trump by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur ISBN: 9781498535229
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: September 27, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
ISBN: 9781498535229
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: September 27, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

This book offers a broad interdisciplinary approach to the changes in the U.S. immigration debate before and after 9/11. A nation’s reaction to foreigners has as much to do with sociology as it does with political science, economics and psychology. Without drawing on this knowledge, our understanding of the immigration debate remains mundane, partial, and imperfect. Therefore, our story accounts for multiple factors, including culture and politics, power, organizations, social psychological processes, and political change. Examining this relationship in the contemporary context requires a lengthy voyage across academic disciplines, a synthesis of seemingly contradictory assumptions, and a grasp of research traditions so vast and confusing that an accurate rendering may seem implausible. And yet, to tell the story of the immigration debate in the age of terrorism, polarization, and Trump in any other way is to tell it in part.

The immigration debate in the United States has always been about openness. Two questions in particular—how open should the door be and what type of immigrant should walk through it—have characterized policy disputes for well over a century. In the current debate, expansionists want to see more legal immigrants in the U.S. and greater tolerance, if not respect, for immigrants. Restrictionists favor lower levels of immigration, stronger borders, and tighter law enforcement measures to stop the stream of ‘illegal’ migration and alleged crime. The aim of this book is to describe how these opposing views materialized in the news media, political rhetoric, and, ultimately, in policy. Much of our argument rests on the idea that history matters, that the dominant narrative about immigration is in constant flux, and that the ‘winner’ of the immigration debate is determined by a vector of contextual elements: the joint impact of current events, enduring traditions, and political-economic forces. Our approach to the immigration debate avoids deterministic claims and grand-scale projections. Although we argue with conviction that a climate of fear played an important role in shaping the debate, the fear itself and its effects on social attitudes and public policy were neither inevitable nor necessarily long lasting.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book offers a broad interdisciplinary approach to the changes in the U.S. immigration debate before and after 9/11. A nation’s reaction to foreigners has as much to do with sociology as it does with political science, economics and psychology. Without drawing on this knowledge, our understanding of the immigration debate remains mundane, partial, and imperfect. Therefore, our story accounts for multiple factors, including culture and politics, power, organizations, social psychological processes, and political change. Examining this relationship in the contemporary context requires a lengthy voyage across academic disciplines, a synthesis of seemingly contradictory assumptions, and a grasp of research traditions so vast and confusing that an accurate rendering may seem implausible. And yet, to tell the story of the immigration debate in the age of terrorism, polarization, and Trump in any other way is to tell it in part.

The immigration debate in the United States has always been about openness. Two questions in particular—how open should the door be and what type of immigrant should walk through it—have characterized policy disputes for well over a century. In the current debate, expansionists want to see more legal immigrants in the U.S. and greater tolerance, if not respect, for immigrants. Restrictionists favor lower levels of immigration, stronger borders, and tighter law enforcement measures to stop the stream of ‘illegal’ migration and alleged crime. The aim of this book is to describe how these opposing views materialized in the news media, political rhetoric, and, ultimately, in policy. Much of our argument rests on the idea that history matters, that the dominant narrative about immigration is in constant flux, and that the ‘winner’ of the immigration debate is determined by a vector of contextual elements: the joint impact of current events, enduring traditions, and political-economic forces. Our approach to the immigration debate avoids deterministic claims and grand-scale projections. Although we argue with conviction that a climate of fear played an important role in shaping the debate, the fear itself and its effects on social attitudes and public policy were neither inevitable nor necessarily long lasting.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Shifting Perceptions of Migration in Senegalese Literature, Film, and Social Media by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book American Unitarianism and the Protestant Dilemma by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Progressive Lawyers under Siege by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book American Exceptionalism, the French Exception, and Digital Media Law by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Lucile H. Bluford and the Kansas City Call by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Gays and Grays by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book The Antipodean Philosopher by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Euripides and the Boundaries of the Human by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Narratives of Immigration and Language Loss by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Political Women by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics and the Discourse of Mark 13 by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Muslim Europe or Euro-Islam by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Why the Humanities Matter Today by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Can the Debt Growth Be Stopped? by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
Cover of the book Emerging Perspectives on Akachi Adimora-Ezeigbo by Joshua Woods, C. Damien Arthur
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy