Cosmic Expansion Slowdown Speedup and the Big Bang Theory

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Physics, Gravity
Cover of the book Cosmic Expansion Slowdown Speedup and the Big Bang Theory by James Constant, James Constant
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: James Constant ISBN: 9781310424588
Publisher: James Constant Publication: March 30, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: James Constant
ISBN: 9781310424588
Publisher: James Constant
Publication: March 30, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Comparing observation and the Big Bang theory, observation tells us that the early universe, over a period of about 3.3 bly, consisted of radiation which later evolved into the galactic system we observe today. The Big Bang theory tells us that the early universe began about 15 bly ago as an initial expansion from nothing forming subatomic particles which lasted for a short time, fewer than 0.4 bly and later evolved into the present system.
Based on Hubble’s linear law v=Hr, space expansion accelerates at the rate a = dv/dt = Hdr/dt = H2r. Thus, assuming linearity of Hubble’s law, both speed v and acceleration a are linear functions of distance r. Currently, actual measurements of speed v and distance r reach out to about 3.3 bly. Beyond that distance, we do not know whether the linearity of Hubble’s law holds and whether the universe expands. Recently, some measurements suggest the universe decelerates (slowdown) and then accelerates (speedup).
A theory which proclaims to explain the universe must explain many observed phenomena including why the universe expands, decelerates (slowdown) and accelerates (speedup). The Big Bang theory, a leading theory, tells us the universe expands because space itself expands but is unable to explain why it expands as v=Hr confirming Hubble’s linear law and why it decelerates and accelerates. Moreover, space expansion is incompatible with observation and theory, including Big Bang theory, because galaxies riding space expansion eschew being converted (evolving) from radiation to actual mass.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Comparing observation and the Big Bang theory, observation tells us that the early universe, over a period of about 3.3 bly, consisted of radiation which later evolved into the galactic system we observe today. The Big Bang theory tells us that the early universe began about 15 bly ago as an initial expansion from nothing forming subatomic particles which lasted for a short time, fewer than 0.4 bly and later evolved into the present system.
Based on Hubble’s linear law v=Hr, space expansion accelerates at the rate a = dv/dt = Hdr/dt = H2r. Thus, assuming linearity of Hubble’s law, both speed v and acceleration a are linear functions of distance r. Currently, actual measurements of speed v and distance r reach out to about 3.3 bly. Beyond that distance, we do not know whether the linearity of Hubble’s law holds and whether the universe expands. Recently, some measurements suggest the universe decelerates (slowdown) and then accelerates (speedup).
A theory which proclaims to explain the universe must explain many observed phenomena including why the universe expands, decelerates (slowdown) and accelerates (speedup). The Big Bang theory, a leading theory, tells us the universe expands because space itself expands but is unable to explain why it expands as v=Hr confirming Hubble’s linear law and why it decelerates and accelerates. Moreover, space expansion is incompatible with observation and theory, including Big Bang theory, because galaxies riding space expansion eschew being converted (evolving) from radiation to actual mass.

More books from James Constant

Cover of the book Black Holes by James Constant
Cover of the book European Elites And Debt Crisis by James Constant
Cover of the book Character of the State by James Constant
Cover of the book Pax Americana Debt Bubble by James Constant
Cover of the book Proof of Riemann's Hypothesis by James Constant
Cover of the book Malthus Revisited by James Constant
Cover of the book How Federal Courts Crush Inventors and Protect Corporate Interests by James Constant
Cover of the book Indipendent Inventors and Pro Corporate Federal Courts by James Constant
Cover of the book History and Law by James Constant
Cover of the book Fiat Money and Economic Globalization by James Constant
Cover of the book Constant v American Micro-Devices (Supreme Court Patent Morass) by James Constant
Cover of the book The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle by James Constant
Cover of the book The Domain of Law by James Constant
Cover of the book Questions Presented Supreme Court Cases by James Constant
Cover of the book The Navier-Stokes Millenium Problem by James Constant
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy