Bureau of Reclamation Colorado River Dams and Water Projects: Colorado River Project, Dallas Creek Project, Glen Canyon Unit, Smith Fork Project - History, Construction

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Technology, Engineering, Civil
Cover of the book Bureau of Reclamation Colorado River Dams and Water Projects: Colorado River Project, Dallas Creek Project, Glen Canyon Unit, Smith Fork Project - History, Construction by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781311011268
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: October 10, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781311011268
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: October 10, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Four documents from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation provide unique insight into the history of Colorado River dams and water projects.

The Colorado River Project (Marshall Ford Dam) - In 1942, the Bureau of Reclamation, in concert with the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) of Texas, oversaw completion of the Marshall Ford Dam(known by Reclamation as the Colorado River Project) on the Colorado River of Texas (not the "other" Colorado River, which runs through six western states). The dam was built in response to the devastating floods that had plagued the capital city of Austin for decades since its establishment as the state capital in 1846. Through the efforts of Texas' incredibly tenacious politicians, such as Lyndon B. Johnson, the city and the land northwest along the Colorado River basin became the focus of a major flood control and hydro-electric project that included six dams, two of which (the Granite Shoals and Marble Falls dams) were added after World War II.

The Dallas Creek Project - In the high mountain valleys of western Colorado, the land is often rich and fertile. But the short growing season and the lack of readily available water make it difficult for farmers to fully utilize the richness of the region's lands. In addition, the short growing season limits the crops which can be grown to those which tend to have low value per acre, making it difficult for farmers to pay for the elaborate irrigation systems necessary to bring a full supply of water to their lands. While it is possible to develop these rich lands, the costs involved make it almost impossible without some kind of assistance. In the late 1950s, the Bureau of Reclamation developed a solution to the cost problem, and the Dallas Creek Project was one of many projects to benefit from that solution. The Dallas Creek Project is located on the Uncompahgre River in west-central Colorado. The area served by the project comprises most of the Uncompahgre River Basin and includes lands in Montrose, Delta, and Ouray Counties. The project is named for Dallas Creek, a major tributary of the Uncompahgre River. Ridgway Dam and Reservoir, the primary features of the project, are located on the Uncompahgre River a few miles north of the town of Ridgway. Lands served by the project run along both sides of the Uncompahgre River northward from Colona to Delta where the Uncompahgre River feeds into the Gunnison River.

The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central Arizona and south central Utah, is one of the more geographically isolated, largest, and most expensive reclamation units ever constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation. It took nearly eight years for crews to top the dam at its height of 710 feet, and another two years for completion of the powerplant. One of four major storage reservoirs along the Colorado and its tributaries as part of the Colorado River Storage Project Act of 1956 (or CRSP), the dam impounds 27,000,000 acre feet—nearly the storage capacity of Hoover Dam—and generates enormous amounts of hydroelectric power for the West.

The Smith Fork Project - When Congressional hearings for the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) took place in 1956, Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois, the learned and eloquent former University of Chicago economist, took offense at the notion of paying for reclamation projects on so-called "high-elevation, low-value" farmlands which were doomed to never grow more than cattle forage. The Smith Fork Project in the West Elk foothills of west-central Colorado, sitting at an average elevation of 6300 feet, was such a project. Watering these high desert farms with expensive Federal reclamation projects was a wasteful investment of taxpayers' dollars, claimed Douglas, for even after irrigation participating project lands such as Smith Fork's would not be worth more than a few hundred dollars an acre.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Four documents from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation provide unique insight into the history of Colorado River dams and water projects.

The Colorado River Project (Marshall Ford Dam) - In 1942, the Bureau of Reclamation, in concert with the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) of Texas, oversaw completion of the Marshall Ford Dam(known by Reclamation as the Colorado River Project) on the Colorado River of Texas (not the "other" Colorado River, which runs through six western states). The dam was built in response to the devastating floods that had plagued the capital city of Austin for decades since its establishment as the state capital in 1846. Through the efforts of Texas' incredibly tenacious politicians, such as Lyndon B. Johnson, the city and the land northwest along the Colorado River basin became the focus of a major flood control and hydro-electric project that included six dams, two of which (the Granite Shoals and Marble Falls dams) were added after World War II.

The Dallas Creek Project - In the high mountain valleys of western Colorado, the land is often rich and fertile. But the short growing season and the lack of readily available water make it difficult for farmers to fully utilize the richness of the region's lands. In addition, the short growing season limits the crops which can be grown to those which tend to have low value per acre, making it difficult for farmers to pay for the elaborate irrigation systems necessary to bring a full supply of water to their lands. While it is possible to develop these rich lands, the costs involved make it almost impossible without some kind of assistance. In the late 1950s, the Bureau of Reclamation developed a solution to the cost problem, and the Dallas Creek Project was one of many projects to benefit from that solution. The Dallas Creek Project is located on the Uncompahgre River in west-central Colorado. The area served by the project comprises most of the Uncompahgre River Basin and includes lands in Montrose, Delta, and Ouray Counties. The project is named for Dallas Creek, a major tributary of the Uncompahgre River. Ridgway Dam and Reservoir, the primary features of the project, are located on the Uncompahgre River a few miles north of the town of Ridgway. Lands served by the project run along both sides of the Uncompahgre River northward from Colona to Delta where the Uncompahgre River feeds into the Gunnison River.

The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central Arizona and south central Utah, is one of the more geographically isolated, largest, and most expensive reclamation units ever constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation. It took nearly eight years for crews to top the dam at its height of 710 feet, and another two years for completion of the powerplant. One of four major storage reservoirs along the Colorado and its tributaries as part of the Colorado River Storage Project Act of 1956 (or CRSP), the dam impounds 27,000,000 acre feet—nearly the storage capacity of Hoover Dam—and generates enormous amounts of hydroelectric power for the West.

The Smith Fork Project - When Congressional hearings for the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) took place in 1956, Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois, the learned and eloquent former University of Chicago economist, took offense at the notion of paying for reclamation projects on so-called "high-elevation, low-value" farmlands which were doomed to never grow more than cattle forage. The Smith Fork Project in the West Elk foothills of west-central Colorado, sitting at an average elevation of 6300 feet, was such a project. Watering these high desert farms with expensive Federal reclamation projects was a wasteful investment of taxpayers' dollars, claimed Douglas, for even after irrigation participating project lands such as Smith Fork's would not be worth more than a few hundred dollars an acre.

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book Will the Bomber Always Get Through? The Air Force and its Reliance on Technology: Norden Bombsight Development, Nuclear Weapons, Vietnam, Success of Stealth, The Future by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Oil Spills in Arctic Waters: An Introduction and Inventory of Research Activities and USARC Recommendations - Mitigation, Containment, Countermeasures, Cleanup and Recovery, Environmental Effects by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Finding the Shape of Space - Future Space Situational Awareness (SSA) Technologies Preserving U.S. Military Freedom of Action in Space, Full Motion Video, Networks, Scramjet Access, Carbon Nanotubes by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Historical Analogs for the Stimulation of Space Commerce: Case Studies of the Transcontinental Railroad, Aerospace Industry, Telephone Industry, Scientific Research in Antarctica, Public Works by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Have the Mexican Drug Cartels Evolved Into a Terrorist Insurgency? Drug Trafficking Street Gangs in Mexico, El Chapo, Los Zetas, Sinaloa, Beltran Leyva, Knights Templar, Juarez, Tijuana Cartels by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Women in Islamic Societies: A Selected Review of Social Scientific Literature - Monolithic Stereotype Succumbs to Multi-Faceted Empirical Studies on Muslim Women, Sex-Role Ideologies, Sacred Texts by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Apollo and America's Moon Landing Program: Apollo 14 Official NASA Mission Reports and Press Kit - 1971 Third Lunar Landing - Astronauts Shepard, Roosa, and Mitchell by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Space Shuttle Columbia STS-107 Tragedy: Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) Transcripts of Board Public Hearings, In-Flight Rescue Options, Crew Survivability by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century FEMA Study Course: Building Partnerships with Tribal Governments (IS-650.a) - Native American Culture, Historical Timeline by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Al-Qaida, the Tribes, and the Government: Lessons and Prospects for Iraq's Unstable Triangle, Middle East Studies Paper, al-Qaeda, the Awakening by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Al-Anbar Awakening: Volume II - Iraqi Perspectives - From Insurgency to Counterinsurgency in Iraq, 2004-2009, Abu Ghraib, View of Daily Life, Religious and Political Perspectives by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century FEMA Study Course: Introduction to Individual Assistance (IS-403) - Presidential Declaration Process, CFR, Mass Care, SBA, IHP, DUA, Business Disaster Loans, Habitability Assistance by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Marines in World War II Commemorative Series: Liberation: Marines in the Recapture of Guam, Operation Forager, Medal of Honor Recipients, Fonte Ridge, General Cushman, Colt Pistol, War Dogs by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Space Shuttle NASA Mission Reports: 1994 Missions, STS-60, STS-62, STS-59, STS-65, STS-64, STS-68, STS-66 by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Foulois and the U.S. Army Air Corps 1931-1935: Air Mail Fiasco, Chief in Trouble, World War I, Billy Mitchell, Rickenbacker, MacArthur, FDR, Drum Board, B-7, B-9, B-10, B-12, B-17, DC-2, XB-15 by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy