Biplanes and Bombsights: British Bombing in World War I

Nonfiction, History, Military, World War I, Germany, British
Cover of the book Biplanes and Bombsights: British Bombing in World War I by George K. Williams, Tannenberg Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: George K. Williams ISBN: 9781786250254
Publisher: Tannenberg Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Tannenberg Publishing Language: English
Author: George K. Williams
ISBN: 9781786250254
Publisher: Tannenberg Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Tannenberg Publishing
Language: English

This study measures wartime claims against actual results of the British bombing campaign against Germany in the Great War. Components of the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS), the Royal Flying Corps (RFC), and the Royal Air Force (RAF) conducted bombing raids between July 1916 and the Armistice. Specifically, Number 3 Wing (RNAS), 41 Wing of Eighth Brigade (RFC), and the Independent Force (IF) bombed German targets from bases in France. Lessons supposedly gleaned from these campaigns heavily influenced British military aviation, underpinning RAF doctrine up to and into the Second World War.
Fundamental discrepancies exist, however, between the official verdict and the first-hand evidence of bombing results gathered by intelligence teams of the RAF and the US Air Service. Results of the British bombing efforts were demonstrably more modest, and costs in casualties and wastage far steeper, than previously acknowledged. A preoccupation with “moral effect” came to dominate the British view of their aerial offensives. Maj Gen Hugh M. Trenchard played a pivotal role in bringing this misperception to the forefront of public consciousness.

After the Armistice, the potential of strategic bombing was officially extolled to justify the RAF as an independent service. The Air Ministry’s final report must be evaluated as a partisan manifestation of this crusade and not as a definitive final assessment, as it has been mistakenly accepted previously.

This study develops and substantiates a comprehensive evaluation of British long-range bombing in the First World War. Its findings run directly counter to the generally held opinion. Natural limitations, technical shortfalls, and aircrews lacking proficiency acted in concert with German defenses to produce far less results than those claimed.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This study measures wartime claims against actual results of the British bombing campaign against Germany in the Great War. Components of the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS), the Royal Flying Corps (RFC), and the Royal Air Force (RAF) conducted bombing raids between July 1916 and the Armistice. Specifically, Number 3 Wing (RNAS), 41 Wing of Eighth Brigade (RFC), and the Independent Force (IF) bombed German targets from bases in France. Lessons supposedly gleaned from these campaigns heavily influenced British military aviation, underpinning RAF doctrine up to and into the Second World War.
Fundamental discrepancies exist, however, between the official verdict and the first-hand evidence of bombing results gathered by intelligence teams of the RAF and the US Air Service. Results of the British bombing efforts were demonstrably more modest, and costs in casualties and wastage far steeper, than previously acknowledged. A preoccupation with “moral effect” came to dominate the British view of their aerial offensives. Maj Gen Hugh M. Trenchard played a pivotal role in bringing this misperception to the forefront of public consciousness.

After the Armistice, the potential of strategic bombing was officially extolled to justify the RAF as an independent service. The Air Ministry’s final report must be evaluated as a partisan manifestation of this crusade and not as a definitive final assessment, as it has been mistakenly accepted previously.

This study develops and substantiates a comprehensive evaluation of British long-range bombing in the First World War. Its findings run directly counter to the generally held opinion. Natural limitations, technical shortfalls, and aircrews lacking proficiency acted in concert with German defenses to produce far less results than those claimed.

More books from Tannenberg Publishing

Cover of the book Because I Was Flesh by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Special Forces Command And Control In Afghanistan by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Helicopters in Irregular Warfare: Algeria, Vietnam, and Afghanistan [Illustrated Edition] by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Messiah by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Sky Master by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Mach One by George K. Williams
Cover of the book With Courage: The U.S. Army Air Forces In WWII by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Strategy For Defeat: The Luftwaffe, 1933-1945 [Illustrated Edition] by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Famous Bombers Of The Second World War, Volume One by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Soviet Actions In Afghanistan And Initiative At The Tactical Level: Are There Implications For The US Army? by George K. Williams
Cover of the book “Able” To Adapt And Conquer by George K. Williams
Cover of the book U.S. Marines In Battle: An-Nasiriyah, 23 March-2 April 2003 [Illustrated Edition] by George K. Williams
Cover of the book The World of Henry Orient: A Novel by George K. Williams
Cover of the book Breaching Walls In Urban Warfare by George K. Williams
Cover of the book ARCHIE, FLAK, AAA, And SAM: A Short Operational History Of Ground-Based Air Defense [Illustrated Edition] by George K. Williams
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy