Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Political, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Are Liberty and Equality Compatible? by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba, Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba ISBN: 9780511846755
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: April 22, 2010
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author: Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
ISBN: 9780511846755
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: April 22, 2010
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

Are the political ideals of liberty and equality compatible? This question is of central and continuing importance in political philosophy, moral philosophy, and welfare economics. In this book, two distinguished philosophers take up the debate. Jan Narveson argues that a political ideal of negative liberty is incompatible with any substantive ideal of equality, while James P. Sterba argues that Narveson's own ideal of negative liberty is compatible, and in fact leads to the requirements of a substantive ideal of equality. Of course, they cannot both be right. Thus, the details of their arguments about the political ideal of negative liberty and its requirements will determine which of them is right. Engagingly and accessibly written, their debate will be of value to all who are interested in the central issue of what are the practical requirements of a political ideal of liberty.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Are the political ideals of liberty and equality compatible? This question is of central and continuing importance in political philosophy, moral philosophy, and welfare economics. In this book, two distinguished philosophers take up the debate. Jan Narveson argues that a political ideal of negative liberty is incompatible with any substantive ideal of equality, while James P. Sterba argues that Narveson's own ideal of negative liberty is compatible, and in fact leads to the requirements of a substantive ideal of equality. Of course, they cannot both be right. Thus, the details of their arguments about the political ideal of negative liberty and its requirements will determine which of them is right. Engagingly and accessibly written, their debate will be of value to all who are interested in the central issue of what are the practical requirements of a political ideal of liberty.

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book The Cambridge History of American Poetry by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book The Cambridge Companion to Baudelaire by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book The Book of Ecclesiastes (Qohelet) and the Path to Joyous Living by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Remythologizing Theology by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Ovid's Early Poetry by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Kemalist Turkey and the Middle East by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Transition from Illegal Regimes under International Law by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book The Unity of Mind, Brain and World by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book A Sociology of Constitutions by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Applied Radiological Anatomy by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book The Civilianization of War by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Music, Culture and Social Reform in the Age of Wagner by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book The Cambridge History of Ireland: Volume 1, 600–1550 by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Modern Fortran by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
Cover of the book Innovation on Demand by Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy