Aesthetics of Negativity

Blanchot, Adorno, and Autonomy

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Aesthetics, Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, Theory, Art & Architecture, Art History
Cover of the book Aesthetics of Negativity by William S. Allen, Fordham University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William S. Allen ISBN: 9780823269303
Publisher: Fordham University Press Publication: April 1, 2016
Imprint: Fordham University Press Language: English
Author: William S. Allen
ISBN: 9780823269303
Publisher: Fordham University Press
Publication: April 1, 2016
Imprint: Fordham University Press
Language: English

Maurice Blanchot and Theodor W. Adorno are among the most difficult but also the most profound thinkers in twentieth-century aesthetics. While their methods and perspectives differ widely, they share a concern with the negativity of the artwork conceived in terms of either its experience and possibility or its critical expression. Such negativity is neither nihilistic nor pessimistic but concerns the status of the artwork and its autonomy in relation to its context or its experience. For both Blanchot and Adorno negativity is the key to understanding the status of the artwork in post-Kantian aesthetics and, although it indicates how art expresses critical possibilities, albeit negatively, it also shows that art bears an irreducible ambiguity such that its meaning can always negate itself. This ambiguity takes on an added material significance when considered in relation to language as the negativity of the work becomes aesthetic in the further sense of being both sensible and experimental, and in doing so the language of the literary work becomes a form of thinking that enables materiality to be thought in its ambiguity.

In a series of rich and compelling readings, William S. Allen shows how an original and rigorous mode of thinking arises within Blanchot’s early writings and how Adorno’s aesthetics depends on a relation between language and materiality that has been widely overlooked. Furthermore, by reconsidering the problem of the autonomous work of art in terms of literature, a central issue in modernist aesthetics is given a greater critical and material relevance as a mode of thinking that is abstract and concrete, rigorous and ambiguous. While examples of this kind of writing can be found in the works of Blanchot and Beckett, the demands that such texts place on readers only confirm the challenges and the possibilities that literary autonomy poses to thought.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Maurice Blanchot and Theodor W. Adorno are among the most difficult but also the most profound thinkers in twentieth-century aesthetics. While their methods and perspectives differ widely, they share a concern with the negativity of the artwork conceived in terms of either its experience and possibility or its critical expression. Such negativity is neither nihilistic nor pessimistic but concerns the status of the artwork and its autonomy in relation to its context or its experience. For both Blanchot and Adorno negativity is the key to understanding the status of the artwork in post-Kantian aesthetics and, although it indicates how art expresses critical possibilities, albeit negatively, it also shows that art bears an irreducible ambiguity such that its meaning can always negate itself. This ambiguity takes on an added material significance when considered in relation to language as the negativity of the work becomes aesthetic in the further sense of being both sensible and experimental, and in doing so the language of the literary work becomes a form of thinking that enables materiality to be thought in its ambiguity.

In a series of rich and compelling readings, William S. Allen shows how an original and rigorous mode of thinking arises within Blanchot’s early writings and how Adorno’s aesthetics depends on a relation between language and materiality that has been widely overlooked. Furthermore, by reconsidering the problem of the autonomous work of art in terms of literature, a central issue in modernist aesthetics is given a greater critical and material relevance as a mode of thinking that is abstract and concrete, rigorous and ambiguous. While examples of this kind of writing can be found in the works of Blanchot and Beckett, the demands that such texts place on readers only confirm the challenges and the possibilities that literary autonomy poses to thought.

More books from Fordham University Press

Cover of the book The Bread of the Strong by William S. Allen
Cover of the book The Unconstructable Earth by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Hating Empire Properly by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Latinx Literature Unbound by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Dante and the Origins of Italian Literary Culture by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Power of Gentleness by William S. Allen
Cover of the book How to Do Comparative Theology by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Rethinking God as Gift by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Plasticity and Pathology by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Secular Lyric by William S. Allen
Cover of the book A Pact with Vichy by William S. Allen
Cover of the book The French of Outremer by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Narratives of Catastrophe by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Delirious Naples by William S. Allen
Cover of the book Fordham by William S. Allen
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy