| Author: | robert straw | ISBN: | 1230000282175 |
| Publisher: | RLP Multimedia | Publication: | November 23, 2014 |
| Imprint: | Language: | English |
| Author: | robert straw |
| ISBN: | 1230000282175 |
| Publisher: | RLP Multimedia |
| Publication: | November 23, 2014 |
| Imprint: | |
| Language: | English |
Who defends today still the idea of a perfect system, coherent and in line with the needs of the citizens, hand before a resounding lie, or he/she doesn't succeed in accepting that feeling, by now shared in wide majority, that brings us to doubt on the real finalities of the same system.
The misinformation is mainly born, and it grows in exponential way, from the single action of "disinformation", to take to the light one all that signals that originate from the outside, to want him to all the costs to entrench behind a barrier of negazionism for fear to admit that not everything perhaps stirs for the correct verse, that is probably by now too late to return back.
To promote a search to identify as, when and because everything this is happened, it would be an enormous enterprise; we can hypothesize only, offering in such way a base of departure for possible further close examinations, that everything was born in the same moment in which we have decided to delegate to others the responsibility of our future and the possibility to ready and to put laws and decrees to the purpose of our daily paper to make simpler and less chaotic into effect.
This choice, dictated by an evident impossibility to imagine a collective management of the State, you/he/she has determined a deep breaking among who is entrusted to manage the power and the same citizens.
If at first sight the matter could appear of little account, in reality you/he/she has been really this tendency to begin a slow, unstoppable to fall some situation.
To delegate the power, if from a point of view it appears as the only possible solution for a fluid administration of the public thing, on the other side it determines a deep breaking over which those people who should guarantee the good operation of the institutions or an enormous number, that nobody exactly knows reign, of people that for work, and almost never for the attainment of an ideal, it administers more or less in way trasparante the public thing.
The committed error resides really in the fact that, together with our delegation, we have also surrendered the control, we have done so that it spread the idea of a state that stirs for account really, that seems almost not to belong to our daily paper an abstract entity of which we often fall victims.
In reality the state we should be us, we should have the last word, we should check operates him of those people to which we have delegated our present and the future of our children.
Who defends today still the idea of a perfect system, coherent and in line with the needs of the citizens, hand before a resounding lie, or he/she doesn't succeed in accepting that feeling, by now shared in wide majority, that brings us to doubt on the real finalities of the same system.
The misinformation is mainly born, and it grows in exponential way, from the single action of "disinformation", to take to the light one all that signals that originate from the outside, to want him to all the costs to entrench behind a barrier of negazionism for fear to admit that not everything perhaps stirs for the correct verse, that is probably by now too late to return back.
To promote a search to identify as, when and because everything this is happened, it would be an enormous enterprise; we can hypothesize only, offering in such way a base of departure for possible further close examinations, that everything was born in the same moment in which we have decided to delegate to others the responsibility of our future and the possibility to ready and to put laws and decrees to the purpose of our daily paper to make simpler and less chaotic into effect.
This choice, dictated by an evident impossibility to imagine a collective management of the State, you/he/she has determined a deep breaking among who is entrusted to manage the power and the same citizens.
If at first sight the matter could appear of little account, in reality you/he/she has been really this tendency to begin a slow, unstoppable to fall some situation.
To delegate the power, if from a point of view it appears as the only possible solution for a fluid administration of the public thing, on the other side it determines a deep breaking over which those people who should guarantee the good operation of the institutions or an enormous number, that nobody exactly knows reign, of people that for work, and almost never for the attainment of an ideal, it administers more or less in way trasparante the public thing.
The committed error resides really in the fact that, together with our delegation, we have also surrendered the control, we have done so that it spread the idea of a state that stirs for account really, that seems almost not to belong to our daily paper an abstract entity of which we often fall victims.
In reality the state we should be us, we should have the last word, we should check operates him of those people to which we have delegated our present and the future of our children.
